Last update:
01/08/10 06:39 AM

Fibromyalgia, Hypothyroidism, Thyroid Hormone Resistance

AskDrLowe: Most Recent Q&As
Homepage

| Adrenal Glands | Armour Thyroid | Anemia | Antibodies | Caffeine |
| Carpal Tunnel Syndrome | Central hypothyroidism | Desiccated Thyroid | Diabetes |
| Diagnosis: Thyroid-Related Problems | DHEA | Diet | Exercise | Female Problems |
| Fibromyalgia: What Is It? | Guaifenesin | Heart & Thyroid Hormone |
| Hyperthyroidism & Fibromyalgia | Hypometabolism | Hypothyroidism & Fibromyalgia |
| Inflammation | Immune System | Metabolic Rehabilitation | Metabolism Testing |
| Nutrition | Osteoporosis | Fibromyalgia Medicines | Pregnancy | Politics of Medicine |
| Proper Use of Thyroid Hormone | Psychology | Skin | Swelling | Scientific Issues |
| T3 | T4 Therapy: Problems | Thyroid Antibodies | Thyroid Gland Removal |
| Thyroid Hormone Resistance | TRH-Stimulation Testing | Thyroid Testing |
| Thyroid Hormone Metabolism | Weight Gain |

dot_clear.gif (54 bytes)

How to Contact Us

Services Dr. Lowe
Offers Patients

Evaluation Forms

How to Prepare
for Your Metabolic Evaluation

How to Submit Questions

General Information

News

Archived E-mail Newsletters

Publications

Patient-to-Patient
Jackie Yellin

About Dr. Lowe

Fibromyalgia Research Foundation

In Memoriam

Links to Other Websites

Myofascial Pain

Nutrition

Testimonials

The Metabolic Treatment
of Fibromyalgia

by Dr. John C. Lowe
Readers' Comments


September 26, 2009
Question:
I’m confused. I read a study of yours at Thyroid Science and you say in it that Hypo Support Formula, which doesn’t require a prescription, works as well as the T3 thyroid hormone called Cynomel. But I keep reading statements on web sites that the over-the-counter thyroid products don’t work well. At one website I read this morning, somebody asked about an over-the-counter thyroid product called Nutri-Meds. She wrote: "I was wondering if anyone takes Nutri-Meds thyroid medication. Are you satisfied with this product? Just if anyone has personal experience to share cause Armour is hard to get without a prescription."

Here’s the answer somebody gave her: “Nutri-Meds is a non-prescription brand of natural thyroid. Patients report that over-the-counter thyroid products, including Nutri-meds[sic], are FAR weaker than all the above [referring to Armour]. Yes, they may be good in a pinch for help, but not for long term support."

In your study, you found that Hypo Support Formula works as well as Cynomel. If that's true, then why do these people say that the over-the-counter thyroid products don’t work all that well?

Dr. Lowe: The person who gave the answer is right only in one sense: If you compare the effects of a dietary (nonprescription) desiccated thyroid to prescription desiccated thyroid, and you use the exact same weight of each, you’ll see that the dietary product is weaker. But if you use enough of the  dietary product, you'll induce the same measurable physiological effects as you can with any other type of thyroid product.

No offense intended, but the person's statement that such products are "good in a pinch for help, but not for long term support" is simply wrong. I know this for two reasons. First, over the years in my clinical practice, I consulted with scores of patients who recovered their health—and maintained it for years—by using a variety of dietary desiccated thyroid products.

However, for a more solid reason, I know that some of the products, such as  Hypo Support Formula (HSF), work as well as any other thyroid hormone products, over-the-counter or otherwise. I know this because for the past year, I've conducted (and am still conducting) clinical trials with dietary desiccated thyroid. The main product I’ve tested, as you obviously know, is HSF. But HSF isn’t the only preparation I’ve tested.

As a result of this year of extensive research, I've done hundreds metabolic measurements and other objective tests. I’ve statistically analyzed the massive data, and the results show unequivocally that when used properly, these products do indeed usually work. However, those three italicized words—when used properly—are crucially important to getting satisfactory results from using the products.

No matter which of the products a person uses, he or she must use it properly. I’ve provided a good deal of information on proper use at ThyroidScience.US. (You can learn a lot at that site from free chapter downloads, and from three particular Q&As at the site. One Q&A is on how to find the dose that's right for you, how to know how you’re treatment is progressing, and how to avoid overstimulation.)

Some naysayers about dietary desiccated thyroid didn't improve much with the products for one reason: they failed to use lifestyle practices that are necessary for anyone to respond well to thyroid hormone. I've had some patients, for example, who didn’t benefit much from dietary desiccated thyroid until they adopted a wholesome, health-sustaining lifestyle. They didn’t see much benefit from the thyroid products until they finally began taking nutritional supplements, eating an anti-inflammatory diet, and exercising regularly. In my experience, these lifestyle practices are synergists that are essential for optimal improvement with any thyroid hormone product.

In short, then, I respectfully disagree with the people at various websites who denigrate dietary desiccated thyroid products. When used properly, and within the context of a health-sustaining lifestyle, most such products quite effectively help maintain normal metabolism and optimal health.

April 5, 2009

Question:
My doctor prescribed Armour Thyroid hoping it would work better than the Synthroid I had taken for years. Within a couple of weeks, my energy was up and I generally felt better. But I had to stop taking it because my skin itched all over. The itching started several days after I started taking the Armour. My doctor switched me back to Synthroid. The itching stopped, but within a couple of weeks, I was as miserable as I've always been on Synthroid. She switched me back to Armour, thinking that my itching had been coincidental, but the itching started again, so I'm now on Synthroid again and miserable again. Any advice?

Dr. Lowe: Your experience in switching back and forth from Synthroid to Armour is consistent to my observations of many patients. They are miserable on Synthroid (or other brands of T4), but although they improve remarkably on Armour, they itch or have other allergic symptoms. I've confirmed that the itching and other symptoms on Armour are allergy-based by having the patients go through a simple test. I have them take 25 mg to 50 mg of Benadryl while still using Armour. If the itching or other symptoms stop within thirty-minutes to an hour, then most likely, the patient is having an allergic reaction, probably to some of the binders or fillers, such as cornstarch. Further confirmation that the itching is an allergic reaction comes from the patient beginning to itch again after the antihistamine effects of Benadryl to wear off.

When patients have reported to me that they've had allergic reactions to Armour, I've recommended that they ask their prescribing clinicians to switch them to Nature-Throid. This product, produced and marketed by RLC Labs, is different from other prescription desiccated thyroid products. The difference is that it contains binding ingredients that are hypoallergenic, such as microcrystalline cellulose. Patients who have switched to Nature-Throid have maintained the benefits they got from switching from Synthroid to Armour, but in addition, they've freed themselves from their allergic reactions to Armour.

April 4, 2009

Question: My nurse practitioner read a study of yours that tested an organic desiccated thyroid product named "Hypo Support Formula." She wants me to use it but we haven't found it online. Do you know where it is available?

Dr. Lowe: The product is available through the following website: http://www.thyroidscience.us/Ordering/howtoorder.htm. The website was set up to provide access to the product until it is more widely available. The study report your nurse practitioner read would have to be the one that was published little more than a week ago: http://www.thyroidscience.com/studies/lowe.2009/lowe.hsf.3.22.09.htm. The full text of the report is available free as a pdf. A prescription isn't necessary, but in using the product, I hope you'll work closely with your nurse practitioner. I wish you the best possible outcome from your use of Hypo Support Formula, or "HSF" as we refer to it.

October 15, 2008

Question: I am hypothyroid and my doctor is treating me with Nature-Throid. I feel better using the Nuture-Throid. My nurse practitioner says my dose above 1 grain is right for me, but I still have symptoms like sluggishness and a bad memory, dry skin, and I’m too cold all the time. My testing just came back and she said I also have type I diabetes. She told me that my symptoms are from the diabetes. Is there any way to tell whether my hypothyroidism or diabetes is the cause of my symptoms?

Dr. Lowe: I’m sorry you have two hormonal disorders to deal with. Some symptoms of hypothyroidism overlap with some of diabetes. The overlap can confuse the patient and his or her clinician. It may not be clear at all which of the two conditions they need to address to relieve the patient’s symptoms. Sometimes, of course, they must address both conditions.

You said your doctor just recently diagnosed your diabetes. Because of this, I assume your diabetes is uncontrolled. If so, you may have symptoms attributable to the diabetes.

Despite that, some of your symptoms are most likely caused by under-treatment for your hypothyroidism. I say this because the 1 grain of Nature-Throid you’re taking is too low to provide optimal benefits to most hypothyroid patients. Endocrinologists long ago made the TSH the be-all-and-end-all for deciding hypothyroid patients’ thyroid hormone dosages. Before this costly mistake of the endocrinology specialty, patients used higher—and more effective—dosages of thyroid hormone. When they used desiccated thyroid, as you are, effective doses for most patients ranged from 2 grains up to 4 grains.[1][2]

If you’re like most patients, then, your effective daily dose will be higher than the 1 grain you're now taking. That will also be your safe dose. I say this emphatically for one reason—it is not safe for clinicians to under-treat hypothyroid patients with thyroid hormone, as most conventional clinicians do nowadays.

Of course, it’s important for you to control your diabetes. You hopefully have surviving insulin-secreting beta cells in your pancreas. If so, you stand a good chance of safely controlling your diabetes by avoiding anti-diabetic drugs. You can mostly likely do this through diet, exercise, and natural medicine treatments. (Comprehensive information on the natural medicine approach to diabetes is in the 3rd edition of the Textbook of Natural Medicine.[3] I highly recommend this book to all diabetic patients and clinicians who treat them.) It will serve you well to go all out in using these methods. If using them controls you diabetes, you can, as I said, avoid anti-diabetic drugs, all of which risk giving you other medical problems.

In general with diabetes, the aim is to maintain a normal blood sugar curve. It’s especially important to control the height of your blood sugar rise after eating. This is important because the peak level, if too high, appears to be associate with the most damaging general effects of diabetes.[3] You should  monitor your peak sugar levels with what must become (as my wife, Tammy, tells our diabetic patients) your new friend, a glucometer. If money is a concern, Walgreen’s TrueTrack glucometer kit is the least expensive on the market; using it and its test strips can save you a great deal of money.

You'll also need to systematically monitor to find your effective dosage of Nature-Throid. At minimum, you should aim at four targets: (1) a basal body temperature between 97.8° and 98.2°F (36.56° and 36.78°C); (2) a basal heart rate in the 70s; (3) freedom from your hypothyroid symptoms and signs; and (4) a sense of well being.

When I say “systematically monitor” in the above paragraph, I mean posting to line graphs at least two sets of measures: (1) your measurements of temperature and heart rate, and (2) the estimated intensity of your symptoms with “symptoms severity scales” twice each week. You can print free of charge both symptoms severity scales and line graphs from our page of evaluation forms; you should use the forms in set 3. (To learn about how to properly monitor, please read chapters 4.3 and 5.2 in The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia.[4])

With a high degree of probability, you can control both your hypothyroidism and your diabetes. To maximize your chances, I urge you to maintain an unyielding commitment to optimal health, insist on truly effective clinical care, and tweak your treatment at intervals based on systematic monitoring. I sincerely wish you the best.

References

1. Hutton, J.H.: Practical Endocrinology. Springfield, Charles C. Thomas Publisher. 1966.
2. Pearce, C.J. and Himsworth, R.L.: Total and free thyroid hormone concentrations in patients receiving maintenance replacement treatment with thyroxine. Br. Med. J., 288: 693, 1984.
4. Textbook of Natural Medicine, 3rd edition, vol.2. Edited by J.E. Pizzorno, Jr. and M.T. Murray. St. Louis, Churchill-Livingston-Elsevier, 2006.
4. Lowe, J.C.: The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia. Boulder, McDowell Publishing Co., 2000.

July 19, 2008

Question:
Thank you for our phone consultation yesterday. I have an additional question for you. From what I am reading about adrenal fatigue, my symptoms seem pretty severe. I have read in several sources that there is no harm in replacing cortisol at a physiologic dose. If the body doesn't need it, it will not cause any harm if the patient weans off it slowly. But if the body does need it, signs of benefit will show fairly rapidly.

Here is what I am wondering. My ability to work is almost non-existent. I am having to put my head down on my desk at least every 20 minutes and am really struggling just to make it through the day. I know I am supposed to do the saliva tests, but I am extremely concerned that I’ll become worse while waiting for this process to take place. I am wondering if you’re willing to recommend that I immediately start the Cortef prescribed last week by the doctor who referred me to you for consulting? I believe doing a trial of Cortef [hydrocortisone] could be diagnostic in its own right, and I will then use saliva testing to regulate my dosing if I show improvement.

Dr. Lowe: Regarding your suggestion that you begin to use Cortef based on your symptoms, your prescribing doctor is the clinician who must authorize you to do an empirical trial of the medication. Based on clinical experience, I don’t think you're likely to harm yourself by a short empirical trial of Cortef, even if you actually don’t need more cortisol or if you have an excess.

However, in that my relationship with you is educational, I must point out an observation from my clinical practice. I have had several patients, all of whom had classic cortisol deficiency symptoms, who turned out to have high rather than low cortisol levels. We learned this as soon as we received their salivary cortisol test results. These patients immediately ceased taking cortisol, and some had to use cortisol-suppressing agents to produce a normal diurnal cortisol pattern.

The brief cortisol trial did these patients no apparent harm. In principle, though, considering the outside likelihood of adverse effects, you may want to err on the side of caution. A patient who decides to try cortisol empirically before we receive her cortisol test results stands some chance, low as it might be, of inducing cushingoid symptoms, such as increased belly fat.

Other cushingoid symptoms include mental and emotional lability. I know you’re suffering now, and I wouldn’t want you to worsen how you feel. Waiting for your cortisol test results is tough enough, but a risk in doing an empirical trial of Cortef—if you have high rather than low cortisol—is worsening any unpleasant mental and emotional effects you’re now suffering from.

When a patient adds cortisol to an already high cortisol level, she risks inducing damage to hippocampal cells in the brain. This can cause a loss of short term memory. Excess cortisol can also suppress immune function, making the patient more susceptible to infections. And as I explain in The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia,[1,p.487] long-term excess cortisol levels can cause a loss of bone mineral density.

Of course, I understand your sense of urgency. In view of the risks, you may be willing to take the gamble and use Cortef to see if it reduces or eliminates some of your troubling symptoms. If you decide to take the risk, however, you must have your prescribing doctor’s approval, as we must respect his province in this circumstance. If he and you decide to commence with a trial, I’ll be happy to help both of you decide how it affects you.

May 6, 2008

Question:
I've been trying to put the pieces together of this complex, confusing puzzle (well, to me anyway) for over a year now. What alerted me to begin looking was the sudden absence of my menstrual period. About six months later, I started working on metabolic balancing with nutritional and herbal supplements at the advice of my chiropractor/nutritionist. She ordered a few blood panels for thyroid function. The treatment made a big difference in how I felt. But I was still concerned about the lack of periods, so I saw my primary doctor. She put me on Synthroid. My lab numbers improved a little and she increased my dose from 60 mcg to 100 mcg. I still don’t feel normal, and I’ve gained about 20 lbs. I feel like I've been spinning my wheels for the past year. My gynecologist has referred me to a reproductive endocrinologist, and he told not to be looking on the Internet for help. Do you think a reproductive endocrinologist is the right route? It would be great to know if I'm heading in the right direction, as it can be very overwhelming.

Dr. Lowe: Your problem, as you described it, seems simple enough to me. Gynecological problems are legend among undertreated hypothyroid females. Common among the problems, as I described in the largest chapter in The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia,[1,p.509-571] is the cessation of periods (amenorrhea).

Such problems make the sale of pharmaceutical drugs to control the symptoms of thyroid under-treatment highly profitable. It’s unfortunate when women are caught in this drug-marketing system. Too often, I regret to say, reproductive endocrinologists continue or worsen a woman’s problem by continuing her under-treatment with thyroid hormone. Most hypothyroid women with suspended periods—and even more often, those with profuse and prolonged bleeding—don’t need the specialized care of a reproductive endocrinologist; they simply need for their doctors to treat them effectively for their hypothyroidism.

You said that you’re now taking 100 mcg of Synthroid. For most patients, that dosage is woefully too low. History shows that for some 95% of patients, safe and effective dosages of any brand of T4, such as Synthroid, range between 200 to 400 mcg.[2][1,p.986 & 859-898]

Tragically, few conventional doctors allow their patients to use high-enough dosages of T4 (or any other thyroid hormone preparation) to be effective. And for many patients (up to 50%[3]), T4-replacement therapy is never effective. Research and vast clinical experience show that most of these patients are rescued by T4/T3 products or T3 alone, when their doctors let them use high enough dosages.

But you have good reason to be hopeful. No one today has to settle for the incompetent care that conventional medicine offers most hypothyroid patients. You have options and only need to learn about and avail yourself of them. Some conventional doctors will tell you to stay away from the Internet in looking for solutions to your health problems. They have good reason to be defensive; as one Harvard Nobel Prize-winning physician wrote, a paltry 25% of patients are satisfied with the care they offer.[4] The Internet, however, is a treasure trove of effective alternatives to often failed conventional medicine. While filtering through Internet nonsense intelligently, I encourage you to use it lavishly.

References

1. Lowe, J.C.; The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia. Boulder, 2000.

2. Pearce, C.J. and Himsworth, R.L.: Total and free thyroid hormone concentrations in patients receiving maintenance replacement treatment with thyroxine. Br. Med. J., 288: 693, 1984.

3. Saravanan, P., Chau, W.F., Roberts, N., et al.: Psychological well-being in patients on ‘adequate’ doses of L-thyroxine: results of a large, controlled community-based questionnaire study. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.), 57(5):577-585, 2002.

4. Lown, B.: The Lost Art of Healing: Practicing Compassion in Medicine. New York, Ballantine Books, 1999.

February 17, 2008

Question:
My doctor refuses to prescribe any thyroid hormone product for me other than Synthroid. He said that Armour's potency isn't reliable and you never know what you're getting with Armour. Is this true?

Dr. Lowe: I began working with patients who were hypothyroid in the late 1980s. To learn about the treatment of hypothyroid patients, I spent a lot of time talking with other doctors about thyroid hormone therapy. I soon learned that most doctors tenaciously held two beliefs that had been shrewdly planted in their minds by the corporation that marketed Synthroid. The beliefs were: (1) the potency of Synthroid tablets was perfectly reliable, and (2) the potency of the tablets or capsules of other products—especially Armour Thyroid—was highly unreliable.

Based on these two beliefs, the doctors dogmatically pronounced that all hypothyroid patients should be treated with Synthroid. The doctors’ pronouncement was thoughtless parroting of a sound bite from the corporation’s marketing campaign—a campaign so effective that Synthroid eventually became the third most-prescribed drug in the U.S.

In my view, the doctors who parroted the Synthroid marketing hype should feel shame; they allowed themselves to be duped by a sales campaign for a product that was—and still is!—no more reliable than any other thyroid hormone product. In previous publications, I have cited the FDA evidence for Synthroid’s lack of reliability.

Of course, Synthroid isn’t the only thyroid hormone product with reliability problems. In my experience, no brand of thyroid hormone is especially reliable. By this, I mean that fairly often, patients find that the potency of the thyroid hormone products they’re taking is lower than the label states.

In my experience, the reliability problem has been worse with products from compounding pharmacies, but the problem is also common for the products of large pharmaceutical companies. It appears to me, then, that all thyroid hormone products are highly vulnerable to influences that reduce their potency. Accordingly, no claim that a product has superior reliability is legitimate.

If you’re new to the use of thyroid hormone, and you’re up to a dose that should be working for you, but you’re not benefiting from it, be sure to let your doctor and your pharmacist know. The dosage range that’s safe and effective for most patients is between 2-to-4 grains (120-to-240 mg) of desiccated thyroid. The equivalent dosage range for T4 is 200-to-400 mcg (0.2-to-0.4 mg). If you’re not improving within this dosage range, you may have thyroid hormone resistance, or the potency of the tablets or capsules you’re using may be lower than what’s stated on the label.

If your thyroid hormone product was prescribed, the bottle containing the pills or capsules will have a batch number. Your pharmacist will probably replace your thyroid hormone tablets or capsules with others from another batch. If you’re using an over-the-counter product such as Nutri-Meds desiccated thyroid, the bottle won’t have a batch number, but you can ask the company to replace the capsules or tablets your currently using.

If thyroid hormone has effectively relieved your hypothyroid or thyroid hormone resistance symptoms, but some of your symptoms have reappeared, you should consider whether the capsules or tablets your presently using have a lower-than-stated potency. You should let your doctor and pharmacist know the symptoms that have recurred. It will also help to have objective evidence, such as a decreased basal body temperature. Your doctor may find that your Achilles reflex that had become normal with thyroid hormone therapy has become slow again. And you may find that your basal temperature is decreased. If your TSH level was within the reference range, it may now be much higher now. Also, if your free T3 level was within the reference range, it may be much lower now. (This is a rare time during treatment when thyroid function testing can actually be of help.)

Clearly, all thyroid hormone products occasionally have potency problems. Because of this, it’s important for patients to stay vigilant for signs that the potency of the capsules or tablets they’re taking isn’t consistent.

February 5, 2008

Question:
I'd like to arrange a short time slot to consult with you if possible. All I want to know is do you do a "different" series of thyroid tests that other primary doctors don't do. What is it that separates you from the rest of the pack. That's it. Please advise. Thank you.


Dr. Lowe:
With most patients, I use thyroid function tests (TSH, free T3, and free T4) and thyroid antibodies only for a patient’s initial diagnosis. Afterward, I follow the practice, in principal, of Dr. Broda Barnes—that is, measuring tissue effects of particular dosages of thyroid hormone rather than remeasuring TSH, free T3, and free T4 levels.

My reason for this different protocol is simple: the TSH, free T3, and free T4 tell us only how the pituitary and thyroid glands are interacting. Of course, the test levels may also tell us something of the influence of thyroid hormone over the hypothalamus in its secretion of TRH, another hormone that influences the pituitary gland's secretion of TSH.

Tissue measures of thyroid hormone tell us what is most important, that is, how the patient's tissues other than the pituitary and hypothalamus are responding to a particular dosage of thyroid hormone. To accomplish this objective, with long distance patients, I mainly use the basal body temperature, basal pulse rate, speed of the Achilles reflex, and the voltage of the electrocardiogram tracing.

With patients who come in for comprehensive metabolic evaluations, I use these same physiological measures. But I also use indirect calorimetry to measure the patient's metabolic rate at rest, and I use bioelectrical impedance to learn the fat content, lean mass, and water content of his or her body. I also use a variety of biochemical measures, a history, the patient's current health status, and a physical exam. I use these to differentially diagnosis the most likely cause if the patient’s metabolic rate is abnormally low or high.

The physiological measures enable me to determine a patient's metabolic status. If it's low, the measures help me to determine the likely cause, such as too little thyroid hormone regulation. If the patient is using thyroid hormone, the testing also enables me to specify how the dosage is impacting the patient's tissues. Unfortunately, the most widely used tests, the TSH, free T3, and the free T4, simply can't give us any meaningful information about that most important question that Dr. Barnes long ago asked—how is a particular thyroid hormone product and dosage affecting the patient's tissues? I hope this answers your question adequately. All best wishes.

February 4, 2008
Question:
In your book The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia, you seem to demolish Dr. Dennis Wilson’s theories. What you say makes sense to me. But what about the fact that lots of doctors, mine included, say they get patients well by using T3 as Dr. Wilson teaches. How do you reconcile on the one hand him being wrong about so much, and on the other hand patients getting well with his treatment?

Dr. Lowe: It is nothing new for people to succeed at practical matters despite not understanding why. An example from another field is Adolf Hitler’s economic successes before world war II. (I hasten to add that in using this example, I make no association whatever between Dr. Wilson’s beliefs or teachings and Hitler’s hideous crimes against humanity. I use the example because it’s about the issue of some people succeeding at something and maybe not knowing why.)

Historian John Toland (who lost relatives in the holocaust) wrote, “Hitler’s achievements in the first four years [of his regime] had truly been considerable and impressive. Like Roosevelt, he had paved the way to social security and old-age benefits. And, like Roosevelt, he had intuitively divined that the professional economists, whose thinking was hobbled by accepted theory, had little understanding of the depression. Both leaders, consequently, had defied tradition to expand production and curb unemployment.”
[1,p.403]

Toland then quotes economist J. Kenneth Gallbraith: “That a nation oppressed by economic fear would respond to Hitler as Americans did to FDR is not surprising.” Toland inserted, “Perhaps [Hitler] understood economics too little to know what he was doing.” Then he quotes Gallbraith again: “But in economics it is a great thing not to understand what causes you to insist on the right course.”

Perhaps that’s true in economics. But I can’t agree that in medicine it’s a great thing not to understand why a clinician does the right thing and helps patients. I believe that Dr. Wilson failing to know why his therapy helps some patients is a not so great a thing. The T3 therapy he recommends does indeed help many patients. Based on his book,
[4,p.17] however, he is mistaken about why the therapy helps them.

For example, as I wrote in The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia,
[2,pp.844-6] he claims that T3 increases body temperature, and the increased temperature activates enzymes that enable patients to get well. It’s true that in a research lab, raising the temperature of a petri dish may increase the activity of some enzymes in it. But inside the human body, the range of temperature changes is generally too small to markedly change the activity of enzymes.

Dr. Wilson has it backward: T3 doesn’t Increase enzyme activity by raising the body temperature; instead, it’s the other way around: T3 increases gene transcription for enzymes (such as sodium-potassium-ATPase), and the resulting increased enzyme activity raises the body temperature. The enzymes do this by cleaving phosphates off ATP molecules. The cleaving releases the energy that was maintaining the phosphate bonds. About half the energy is used to fuel chemical reactions. The other half is released as body heat.

This may seem trifling, and indeed, the issue of which comes first, increased temperature or enzyme activity, may only be an academic concern. But other issues I believe Dr. Wilson gets wrong have practical implications. For example, I don’t believe sustained-release T3 is the best use of T3. The reason? The longer T3 stays in the small intestine, the greater the chance that calcium and other agents in food will bind some of the T3. The binding will then carry the T3 out in the patient’s stool, reducing the amount that reaches his blood.

Moreover, Dr. Wilson’s idea that the enzyme that converts T4 to T3 gets “stuck”
[3,p.2] is entirely without scientific substantiation.[2,p.280] In fact, the relevant research literature shows this notion to be close to the outer realm of possibilities. Directing treatment at a “stuck” enzyme is to therapeutically shoot way off target. In contrast, treatment intelligently directed at a target that is truly instrumental in causing a patient’s symptoms is far more likely to benefit the patient.

As may be with Hitler’s economic successes, Dr. Wilson’s treatment protocol enables some patients to get well, although I believe he doesn’t know why. Too of many of the mechanisms he proposes are refuted by the research literature. Therefore, I believe that what I wrote of the success of his treatment and the mechanisms by which it does so is consistent. Nonetheless, I appreciate you bringing the seeming inconsistency to my attention.

Reference
1. Toland, J.: Adolt Hitler. NY, Ballantine Books, 1976.
2. Lowe, J.C.: The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia. Boulder, McDowell Publishing Co.,
2000.
3. Wilson’s Syndrome Patient Instruction Sheet. Publisher nor date designated.
4. Wilson, E.D.: Wilson’s Syndrome. Orlando, Cornerstone Publishing Co., 1991.

January 2, 2008

Question: I am a naturopathic doctor and have hypothyroidism and adrenal insufficiency. I’ve been taking medication for these conditions over the past several years. Despite experimenting with different dosages and combinations, I am yet to find the correct doses. I did feel well and stable for 18 months while on a combination of 50 mcg T3 and 15 mg of hydrocortisone.

After a large stress, however, I developed hypothyroid symptoms again. I increased by T3 to 70 mcg, but all that did was keep me awake and not relieve my symptoms. My doctor tested me and said that my TSH levels showed that I was hyperthyroid. Because of this, he lowered my dosage to 30 mcg of T3 and added 25 mcg of T4. I became severely ill on this and my health declined drastically over six months. My doctor refused to change the medication because now my TSH level was back to normal.

On my own, I added two grains of Armour per day and improved very quickly. Under the care of another doctor, I’m now on 4 grains of Armour per day and 15 mg of hydrocortisone. I’m fairly stable on this combination, but my weight is a problem, and I’m concerned about it. When I was on 50 mcg of T3, my other symptoms (depression, anxiety, fatigue, muscle pain, hair falling out, poor concentration, insomnia) cleared up. My weight also fell back to normal, and I maintained the lower weight. But this time, after my episode of hypothyroidism, my weight hasn't come back down. This is troubling because I follow an excellent health program. I eat a perfect diet, take nutritional supplements, and I’ve done practically every healing regimen in the natural medicine world. I exercise very hard with weights and cardio—one hour in the morning four-to-five days a week. Then I do a very brisk walk for an hour most evenings. Despite this regimen, I’m in constant pain. And my weight has stayed higher than normal. I have a layer of fluidy, fatty, flabby, cellulite type of fat over my arms, belly, thighs, and butt. It doesn't seem to shift no matter how hard I exercise. Is it possible that I need more T3 to get rid of the pain and flab? I love your work. Thank you in anticipation of your reply.

Dr. Lowe: I am sorry you’ve had the health problems you describe. Whenever I hear from a clinician such as you, I regret even more the confusion that reigns in the field of clinical thyroidology. You’re by far not the only clinician perplexed about how to use thyroid hormone effectively to alleviate problems such as your pain and fat.

When you went through the severally stressful time you mentioned, you most likely needed to temporarily increase your cortisol dosage rather than your T3 dosage. And by increasing your T3 dosage, you may have worsened the cortisol deficiency induced by the stress.

When the adrenal cortices are functioning well, stress causes them to substantially increase their secretion of cortisol. In my opinion, during stress, the person on physiologic cortisol therapy, as you’re on, should mimic what the adrenal cortices do during stress. The person should take more cortisol than during tranquil times.

During the stressful time you experienced, it’s highly likely that your need for cortisol markedly increased. By increasing your T3 dosage, you may have sped up the clearance of cortisol through your liver. This would have decreased the cortisol available to your cells at a time when you needed much more than usual. You said that at this time, you again developed symptoms of hypothyroidism. It’s possible that the symptoms were actually those of a cortisol deficiency. That’s likely if the hypothyroid-like symptoms included fatigue, muscle weakness, lower tolerance of stress, and low blood pressure upon standing up.

Armour works well when the patient takes a high-enough dosage. It’s possible, however, that you aren’t taking enough. On your dosage of 4 grains, you’re getting 36 mcg of T3. This is only 4 mcg less than when you felt well and stable on 50 mcg. However, the difference may be substantial for you as an individual.

The problem I see in cases such as yours is a black hole of sorts: how much of the T4 in the Armour (152 mcg in the 4 grains) do you absorb and convert to T3? We don’t know. Some studies indicate that while we absorb almost 100% of T3, we absorb variable amounts of T4, for example 80% or 85%. But how much of it ends up converted to T3 and bound to T3-receptors is a mystery. Because we never know how much T4 is effectively used by one’s body, I believe that using T3 is preferable. The relationship between symptoms or symptom relief and the T3 dosage is far clearer than with T4. More T3 dosage might also reduce or relieve your pain by inhibiting substance P production, by repressing the preprotachykinin-A gene, which codes for both substance P and its receptor.[1,p.732]

I hope, doctor, that you’re soon able to relieve your pain and lose your excess fat. I suspect that you can do so by raising your T3 dosage a small amount. Also, if you experience any prolonged or intense stress, I hope you’ll consider that temporarily increasing your cortisol dosage is the proper course of action.

Reference

1. Lowe, J.C.: The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia. Boulder, McDowell Publishing Co., 2000.

December 10, 2007

Question: My internist is urging me to order your book The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia. Dr. Jones told me that the book is an encyclopedia of everything I’ll want to know about the thyroid field and that I should have it during my treatment. Your publishing company says that the book is on back-order. My doctor loaned me one of his copies, but he made me vow to bring it back. As I sat in his office and scanned the many informative chapters, I began to understand why he treasures it so much. The information seemed endless and it was as though someone had written a book about my symptoms that made sense. Do you know when the publisher will have new copies to sell? After reviewing my doctors’ copy, I am anxious to have my own.

Dr. Lowe: I talked with the publisher after I read your email yesterday. I was told that they’ve been shipping the newly printed and bound books for the last two weeks. If you’ll contact them, I’m sure they’ll get a copy to you quickly.

I’m sorry the publisher ran out of copies and you couldn’t get one when you first ordered it. The publisher keeps a tight check on the available inventory of the book. They do so to avoid running out of copies before having the book printed and bound again. But I was told that at times, so many copies are ordered at once that it cleans out what seemed like an adequate inventory. Then they have to wait for new copies to be printed, bound, and shipped to the fulfillment center. Sorry you got caught in the middle of one of those episodes.

I want to thank you for your letter; it gave me pause that has improved my state of mind, and I’m grateful. The pause your email gave me was for a specific reason. This past year has been especially difficult for me on a personal level and it has interfered with my ability to help those people who need help the most. As the year nears its end, though, your email reminds me that I have good reason to feel happy and fulfilled, no matter what the horrors of the last year.

The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia, my magnum opus, has been enormously successful in improving understanding, and through that, enabling doctors to relieve more of their patients’ suffering. I have to say, however, that more patients than doctors have bought the book and helped themselves.

I made the book an encyclopedic coverage of the fields of hypothyroidism and thyroid hormone resistance. In doing this, I used what we’ve called "fibromyalgia" as the main pattern of symptoms to illustrate vitally important points about thyroid-regulation of the body and mind. I pressed on for some ten years, working almost every waking hour, until the encyclopedic job was done. With the support of my editor, Jackie Yellin and her husband, Michael, I was able to complete this enormous task.

Looking back, Jackie, Michael, and I don’t know how we finished the book, and in all honesty, we don’t believe we could do it again. Despite that, The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia now exists. And although we’ll eventually add addenda in a second volume, every word in the book is as valid as it was when McDowell Publishing Company published it in 2000.

When I think of the good so many people say the book has done for them, the troubles of the last year dwarf into insignificance, and I feel that my goal of relieving as much human suffering as I can during my short time here has not been a frustrated commitment. Thousands of emails and letters of thanks from physicians and patients testify to the help the book has been. Moreover, when I think that Bjørn Johan Øverbye, MD, in Norway, was inspired by the book enough to spend a year doing research that turned out to confirm what he terms "The Lowe Thesis," I feel immense gratitude to him and great satisfaction with the book.

I guess I’ve digressed a bit. To get back to your question, the book is now available for prompt shipping. I sincerely hope that for you, the book justifies your internist’s confidence in it. My sincerest thanks for your email and best wishes for your holidays.

November 1, 2007

Question:
Have you worked with any medical doctors in Anchorage Alaska? If so, could you pass on their name? I need a good doctor to work with me. Thank you.

Dr. Lowe: I regret to say that I haven’t worked or communicated with any doctors in your area whom I can refer you to. I trust that there are some quality practitioners there, but I just haven’t yet had the opportunity to communicate with any.

I think your best chances for finding a cooperative, scientifically-minded, up-to-date clinician is to go to the following website of the Functional Medicine Institute:

http://www.functionalmedicine.org/resources/healthpractitioners.asp

If you click on the "Find a FM Practitioner" link, you may locate a quality clinician in your area. Keep in mind that the clinician who’ll serve your needs best may be any one of the different types of physicians, an MD, DO, ND, or DC. Or the clinician may be a nurse practitioner, physician’s assistant, or another type of practitioner. The scope of practice of the different types of clinicians may differ somewhat, but what's most important is the functional medicine orientation.

I spoke at the annual conference of the Functional Medicine Institute this part year. My wife, Tammy, and I had the privilege—and I sincerely consider to have been a privilege—of spending a lot of time talking with clinicians who are members of the Institute.

I must say, I’ve never interacted with another group of clinicians with whom I was more impressed. They were truly inspiring. They were open-minded and eager to learn cutting-edge methods from scientific natural medicine. Of extreme importance to me, they were earnest and passionate about acquiring whatever new information they could use to help their patients get well. And in addition, I’ve never encountered a group of clinicians who, as a whole, had a more accurate understanding of rational clinical methods for treating hypothyroid and thyroid hormone resistance patients.

I wish you the best for finding a functional medicine clinicians in your area.

October 29, 2007

Comment: I admire your courage for speaking against Dr. Honeyman’s statements about metabolic rehabilitation. A similar situation happened to me years ago after I taught a surgical resident a technique I developed. The surgical resident that I mention here returned to his country, changed my technique a little, then lied by saying he created the whole technique himself. He then used the altered technique to build a profitable reputation and career. I was most upset over the change he made to the technique because this made it less effective for the patients I developed it for.

For years, I protested the reduced effectiveness of the technique. My protests, however, drew accusals that I was only jealous of the successful reputation of the younger surgeon. Few surgeons and other physicians cared about the true basis of my protests. After several years, I stopped protesting and watched him build a name for himself based on his alteration of my technique.

I expect that like I, you have taken barbs for speaking out and protesting. By making the truth known, however, you may avoid some bitterness I have had since my former resident’s degradation of my technique. Knowing this first hand, I sympathize with the protest you wrote, and again, I admire you for speaking out.

Dr. Lowe: Thank you for your sympathy over this issue. In turn, I empathize with your feelings from your experience with your former resident. What’s most unfortunate, of course, is that your surgical technique, revised for your former resident’s personal gain, may help patients less than the technique you originally formulated. To me, that’s not jealousy; it’s a matter of humane concern for the patients for whom you developed the surgical technique.

I suppose the outrage you and I have felt is a price some doctors pay for our pro bono contributions to humanity. Other innovative doctors go about it another way: they patent the procedures they develop and then sell them to other clinicians through binding contracts. One could say that these other doctors are wiser than you and I. Maybe that’s true: the patents they take out and contracts they make may protect the integrity of the procedures they develop and thereby ensure that patients gain from the procedures as they were originally developed.

However, if I had to once again originate and develop metabolic rehab, I would do it the same as before—widely publish how it’s properly done and encourage as many doctors and patients as possible to use it. I created the protocol to help relieve as much human suffering as possible. Because of this, widespread use of the protocol is more important. This is far more important to me than contractually keeping another clinician from misrepresenting it, as contracts might limit the clinicians who’d use the protocol. Instead of contracts, I’ll use my freedom of speech and continue to speak out to protect the protocol’s integrity and to promote its use.

Again, thank you for your sympathetic letter. And please accept my condolences for the misrepresentation of your surgical technique.

October 22, 2007

Question: I asked my family doctor to let me try T3 therapy and she has agreed. She told me, however, that if I take too much and get overstimulated, it may take a few weeks for me to get over it. Is it true that I may be overstimulated that long?

Dr. Lowe: If your doctor is concerned about you taking too much T3 for you and being overstimulated, I suggest that you ask her to prescribe a small quantity of propranolol tablets, as a safety net. Propranolol is a general beta-blocker, and usually, 20-to-30 minutes after swallowing it, overstimulation of tissues stops.[1,p.766] This is true whether T3 or T4 causes the overstimulation. The relief from a single dose of propranolol, in my experience, may last from two-to-eight hour.

Of course, patients who have asthma should not use beta-blockers. For them, it’s usually better just to wait for the overstimulation to subside. Just waiting works fairly quickly if the patient gradually reduces his or her dose of T3,[2,p.394-395] starting with the next dose. After decreasing the dose, abnormally fast metabolism from T3 usually decreases within 1-to-2 days. From taking T4, however, metabolism may slow only after 10-to-14 days.

As I wrote in The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia,[3,p.1022] excessively rapid metabolism slows down even faster than 1-to-2 days in some patients when they reduce their T3 dosages. I’ve read reports of different times for the offset of symptoms of overstimulation after patients stopped T3 or reduce their dosages. The reports are consistent with my clinical experiences.

Tittle, for example, wrote that when his patients had adverse reactions to T3, the reactions disappeared within several days after the patients lowered their dosages of T3 or stopped it altogether.[4,p.273] In contrast, Wiener and Lindeboom reported that they gave a patient a dose of 300 mcg of T3 each day for two weeks. They wrote, "The patient grew restless and nervous, her eyes gleamed, and she complained of headache, cold perspiration, and palpitation. Her pulse rate was 120." Her symptoms of overdosage disappeared, they wrote, in the course of the same day when they reduced her dosage to 150 mcg (50 mcg three times per day).[5] I, too, have seen this rapid offset of overstimulation, although for most of my patients, relief has taken a day or two.

Finding each patient’s safe and effective dosage of thyroid hormone is an individual matter. The same is true for the offset of overstimulation when a patient takes too much thyroid hormone. This means, of course, that clinicians must consider each patient as an individual who may not respond as most other patients do. Statistical measures for such matters should serve only as rough guides that may not apply to many patients. I hope this is helpful to you and your doctor.

References

1. Dillmann, W.H.: The cardiovascular system in thyrotoxicosis. In Werner and Ingbar’s The Thyroid: A Fundamental and Clinical Text, 6th edition. Edited by L.E. Braverman and R.D. Utiger, New York, J.B. Lippincott Co., 1991, pp.759-770.

2. Sawin, C.T.: The development and use of thyroid preparations. In The Thyroid Gland: A Practical Clinical Treatise. Edited by Van Middlesworth, Chicago, Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc., 1986, pp.389-403.

3. Lowe, J.C.: The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia. Boulder, McDowell Publishing Co., 2000.

4. Tittle, C.R.: Effects of 3,5,3’ l-triiodothyronine in patients with metabolic insufficiency. J.A.M.A., 162:271-273, 1956.

5. Wiener, J.D. and Lindeboom, G.A.: Observations on an unusual case of myxoedema. Acta Endocrinol., 39:439- 456, 1962.

October 7, 2007

Question:
My doctor believes that T4 primarily effects the neuropsych arena, the brain, and that the best symptoms to monitor are cognitive function and mental sharpness. He believes that T3 primarily effects the peripheral parts of the body, with the best symptoms to monitor being coldness, fatigue, heart rate, hair, skin, nails, and constipation. Because of this, he prescribes Synthroid, which is T4 for depression and poor memory, and Armour, which has T3, for the rest of the body. Is there any evidence of this?

Dr. Lowe: With due respects to your doctor, the evidence is conclusively against what he believes about T4 and T3. His belief is a version of the false belief that T4 but not T3 crosses the blood-brain barrier into the brain.

I rank this belief as one the most common false beliefs in modern medicine about thyroid hormone. As best I can determine, the belief derives from researchers who conducted two relatively crude rat studies in the 1950s. From those studies, the researchers reached the unfortunate false conclusion. And, like circulating gossip in some small towns, the falsehood penetrates and lodges in the belief systems of doctors, and it stays there with the resistance to destruction of prions.

I’ve explained this matter in detail on drlowe.com where I wrote: "This false belief is virtually an indelible stain in the memory of patients and physicians, and to clear it away, I think we’ll have to scrub long and loud with the solvent of truth." I encourage you to read the short piece and share it with your doctor.

To sum up, T3 does cross the blood-brain barrier and enters the brain. It does this by binding to the same transport protein (transthyretin) that carries T4 across the barrier. T4 binds more readily to the thyroid hormone receptors within that protein, but T3 nonetheless grabs hold of the protein and, along with T4, rides it into the brain.

August 19, 2007B

Question:
During the past 5 weeks I have been attending a weight-loss program and have lost 11 pounds. I need to lose at least another 3 stones [a "stone" is a British weight unit equivalent to 14 pounds]. However, I have not felt well whilst on this diet despite eating "healthily." In fact some of my hypothyroid symptoms have returned, and I’m feeling very tired, breathless, and am losing hair, and so on. I recently had a blood test which showed TSH 0.02 (0.35-4.5), T4 24.4 (11-26), T3 4.6 (3.9-45.8). Apart from the TSH, all levels are within the range given. My questions is, please: Does weight loss unbalance one's thyroxin levels? I would be so grateful for any advice, as I’m at a loss of how to help myself.

Dr. Lowe: I’m sorry you feel at a loss, but I really don’t think you have reason for concern. I say this because your TSH and thyroid hormone levels are what we expect in most people when they severely restrict their calorie intake. Based on the relevant studies, these altered levels will reverse back to their usual levels, even if you continue to restrict your calorie intake.

You wrote that your TSH was out of range, and your T4 and T3 levels were in range. However, it’s important to note that your T4 was in the upper end of its range, and your T3 was in the lower end of its range. If your levels weren’t the same before your began dieting, then the answer to your question about thyroxine is yes: weight loss through calorie restriction can alter your thyroxine level, but also your TSH and T3 level. If calorie restriction is severe enough, the T4 level usually goes up, often into the upper end of the range, where yours is.

Our understanding of what happens to our hormone levels during calorie restriction comes partly from studies of anorexic patients.[1] When humans, including those with anorexia, lose substantial weight quickly, the person is stressed, and this causes her cortisol level to rise. When the cortisol level rises far enough, the cortisol suppresses the thyroid system. It suppress the system in two ways: First, the cortisol inhibits TSH secretion, lowering the TSH level; second, the cortisol inhibits the enzyme that converts T4 to T3, raising the T4 level and lowing the T3 level. Your TSH and thyroid hormone levels exactly fit this high-cortisol-induced pattern: a lower TSH, a higher T4, and lower T3 level.

Again, I caution you not to fret over this lab pattern. If your cortisol level is high and suppressing your thyroid system, the suppression is transient. When your cortisol level comes down, then your TSH and thyroid hormone levels will return to their usual levels. This usually takes 1-to-3 weeks.[3][4][5] [3][4][5]

Keep in mind, however: if your dieting-raised cortisol level remains high for some reason, your thyroid system will most likely escape from the cortisol suppression. The same is true for the patient who is taking cortisol analog drugs such as prednisone and prednisolone for a prolonged time: her thyroid system is almost certain to escape the suppression within weeks.

This well-documented escape of the thyroid system is something Dr. Dennis Wilson apparently wasn’t aware of when he formulated and disseminated one of his beliefs. That belief is that high cortisol causes the enzyme that converts T4 to T3 to get "stuck" in some people. When it sticks, and the people then generate too little T3 from T4, they develop symptoms of too little thyroid hormone regulation. Wilson crowned these symptoms "Wilson’s syndrome." (I discuss this matter at length in the section titled "Reverse-T3 (rT3)" on pages 806 and 807 of The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia.[2])

As I said, you don’t have to be concerned about this enzyme becoming stuck in you. My friend and colleague Richard Garrison, MD, and I looked long and hard for lab evidence that Wilson’s theory of a stuck enzyme was right. After a year or so of laboratory testing of patients, we failed to find evidence that Wilson was right.

I know that losing weight is tough for many people, and want you to know that I admire you for going through the process of losing the 11 lbs. I hope that what I’ve written here will give you an understanding why your TSH and thyroid hormone levels are as they are. From that, I hope you’ll continue on with your weight lose program without worry over these temporarily altered levels.

References
1. Natori, Y., Yamaguchi, N., Koike, S., et al.: Thyroid function in patients with anorexia nervosa and depression. Rinsho Byori, 42(12):1268, 1994.

2. Lowe, J.C.: The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia. Boulder, 2000.

3. Nicoloff, J.T., Fisher, D.A., and Appleman, M.D.: The role of glucocorticoids in the regulation of thyroid function in man. J. Clin. Invest., 49:1922, 1970.

4. Alford, F.P., Baker, H.W.G., Burger, H.G., et al.: Temporal patterns of integrated plasma hormone levels during sleep and wakefulness. I. Thyroid-stimulating hormone, growth hormone and cortisol. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 37:841, 1973.

5. Brabant, A., Brabant, G., Schuermeyer, T., et al.: The role of glucocorticoids in the regulation of thyrotropin. Acta Endocrinol. (Copenh), 121:95, 1989.

August 19, 2007

Question:
I sent you a question by email, and the next day I saw something that horrified me. You posted my question about my personal medical problem to your website at AskDrLowe@drlowe.com. I’m shocked and disappointed that you obviously have no concern that my family and friends might know that I’m the person who wrote to you. Don’t you care about people’s privacy? How can you claim to want to help people but then put them at risk of embarrassment this way?

Dr. Lowe: I care a great deal about other people’s privacy, and I avoid any potentially embarrassing disclosure of information people send to me at AskDrLowe@drlowe.com. For the reason I give below, your upset is not warranted, and I hope you calm down after reading it.

When I wake up from sleep (usually in the early morning hours, and then again after a nap before my clinic duties start), my first action is usually to turn on my computer. Then I go online to read the new emails at AskDrLowe@drlowe.com, where I found yours. Some days I see only a few new emails, and others days I find upwards toward a hundred.

Among the new emails, I first look for ones that suggest the writers may be suicidal. I answer those first. I give their questions top priority because I feel that it’s imperative to quickly give them any hope or practical help I can.

Next, I look for another category of emails: those that contain virtually the same question as several other emails I’ve read that morning—or, sometimes, many other emails I’ve received over the last month or so. Some days, five, ten, or more emails contain practically the same question, often word-for-word. I give the question in these emails second priority. I do this because I assume answering multiple emails containing the same question gives me the chance to do something important: save time writing different versions of the same answer, and, through a single answer, help more than one person at once.

When I answer these multiple emails on AskDrLowe@drlowe.com, I don’t, of course, post all the people’s emails along with my answer. As I said, the authors of the emails ask basically the same question. It would be repetitious to my readers to read all the emails.

To answer the question the writers have asked, I often select one of the emails—the one that most clearly expresses the question all have asked. Sometimes I post the author’s email exactly as he or she wrote it. But most of the time, I edit the question (as little as possible) for two reasons: to make it concise, and to make sure it clearly expresses the specific concern of all the writers.

On the day I opened and read your question, I’d received several others that asked basically the same question. That question in the other emails could have been written by you almost verbatim. As it happened, however, I did not use your email as the one to edit and answer.

You seem to feel that you and your health problem are widely known by the general public—so much so that describing the problem is, to you, certain to reveal your identity, and, as a result, we’re all sure to see your picture on the front page of the Inquirer as we stand in line at supermarket checkout counters. Of course, you may be Brad Pitt or Bill Clinton. If so, please understand that scores of thousands of others share exactly the health problem you have. That assures your anonymity. This is especially true in that I didn’t publish your name in the Q&A, and the question in the Q&A isn’t in your rather distinct writing style.

I regret your upset, but this matter is really nothing for you to be upset about.

August 18, 2007

Question:
My 12-year-old daughter has symptoms that her pediatrician said are fibromyalgia. From reading what you’ve written on drlowe.com, I know that you’ve proven that fibromyalgia is really hypothyroidism. When I told her pediatrician this, he tested her TSH. He said it was normal so she’s not hypothyroid. But I also know from reading drlowe.com and ThyroidUK.org that the TSH is not a good test for hypothyroidism. My husband and I want to bring our daughter to your clinic to see if her metabolic rate is low. My question is, do you only test the metabolic rates of adults, or can you test children, too? Keep in mind that she’s only 12-years-old.

Dr. Lowe: We do measure the resting metabolic rates of children, just as we do adults. However, there is an important difference in calculating the metabolic rates of children and adults.

In calculating a child’s metabolic rate, I use equations that are different from those for adults. Fortunately, through the 20th century, researchers developed equations that are appropriate to different age groups.

Because of this, when we measure the metabolic rate of a child, I use the equations that are appropriate for the child’s age group. Otherwise, if I used equations appropriate for adults, I would reach a wrong conclusion about the child’s metabolic rate. For quality metabolic testing, then, age-specific equations are essential. It took me several years to accumulate the different equations scattered through many journals, some of them published in languages other than the only one I speak, English. But I do have them to use, depending on the age of a child.

By the way, you wrote, "I know that you’ve proven that fibromyalgia is really hypothyroidism." My specific conclusion is, "too little thyroid hormone regulation is the main underlying mechanism of most patients’ fibromyalgia." I have a special reason for this specific statement. That is, most doctors think of hypothyroidism as a thyroid hormone deficiency; however, the cause of many patients’ fibromyalgia is not a thyroid hormone deficiency, but is instead peripheral resistance to thyroid hormone. So, I usually state that most patients’ fibromyalgia is underlain by either a thyroid hormone deficiency, or thyroid hormone resistance.

However, you can use the terminology of my friend and research colleague Richard Garrison, MD that he used in my book The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia.[1,pp.322-323] Accordingly, by analogy to diabetes: a thyroid hormone deficiency is "type I hypothyroidism"; and thyroid hormone resistance is "type II hypothyroidism." Using his terminology, your statement is correct: most patients’ fibromyalgia is underlain by hypothyroidism—a disorder for which the TSH is not a valid or reliable test.

Reference

1. Lowe, J.C.: The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia. Boulder, McDowell Publishing Company, 2000.

August 4, 2007

Question:
My medical doctor told me that I have fibromyalgia. But my chiropractic physician says she thinks I have thyroid resistance. When she takes my thyroid blood tests, however, they keep coming up negative, and my medical doctor says that this shows nothing is wrong with my thyroid. I just want to know. Do I have fibromyalgia or is it thyroid resistance? Can you send me something I can give my doctors to explain which of these I have?

Dr. Lowe: With the little information you gave, I can only answer you in general terms about the two disorders you mentioned—fibromyalgia and thyroid hormone resistance. Feel free to give my answer to your question to both your medical and your chiropractic doctors. Hopefully my answer will clarify for them—and you—that what one of them calls "fibromyalgia" can be exactly the same as what the other calls "thyroid hormone resistance."

First, though, let me say that I’m sincerely sorry you’ve been suffering. I’m especially sorry that your suffering is complicated by confusion over what disorder underlies your symptoms, and what to do to alleviate it.

My research shows that what we call "fibromyalgia" is, for the most part, several signs and symptoms caused mainly by too little thyroid hormone regulation. The inadequate thyroid regulation may result from a thyroid gland disorder that causes it to produce too little thyroid hormone. We call this disorder "primary hypothyroidism." On the other hand, your symptoms may result from a failure of your hypothalamus or pituitary gland (two structures in your brain) to properly regulate your thyroid gland. When improperly regulated, the gland can produce less than optimal amounts of thyroid hormone. This disorder is called "central hypothyroidism."

Then again, your fibromyalgia symptoms may result from what we classify as peripheral thyroid hormone resistance. (I’ve championed the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral thyroid hormone resistance for some twenty years. Because of this, I possibly have more experience treating this particular disorder than anyone else.) TSH, free T4, and free T3 levels are "normal" when a patient has this particular form (the peripheral form) of thyroid hormone resistance. As a result, the TSH, free T4, and free T3 levels are completely useless for distinguishing which patients have or don’t have peripheral thyroid hormone resistance.

Many doctor and patients are confused about why the TSH, free T4, and free T3 levels are normal in peripheral resistance patients. However, we understand clearly why these blood hormone levels are useless when it come to diagnosing or treating peripheral thyroid hormone resistance. The reason is that in this disorder, the pituitary gland responds normally to thyroid hormone. When the thyroid hormone level rises, the TSH goes down, and when the thyroid hormone level goes down, up goes the TSH. This relationship, of course, is the normal interaction of the pituitary and thyroid glands.

But in patients with peripheral resistance, tissues other than the pituitary gland respond sluggishly to the normal levels of free T4, and free T3. Because of these peripheral tissues’ sluggish response, "normal" amounts of free T4 and free T3 are too little properly regulate the metabolism of the tissues; patients must have larger amounts of T4 and T3 to keep the metabolism of most peripheral tissues normal and the afflicted patients free from symptoms. Without larger amounts of the hormones, patients suffer symptoms associated with deficient regulation of the tissues by thyroid hormone—just as if they had a thyroid hormone deficiency.

For millions of patients, thyroid hormone under-regulation of tissues other than the pituitary gland causes classic (and historically-documented) symptoms of characteristic of hypothyroidism. The symptoms, for the most part, are the same as those of fibromyalgia: chronic pain and abnormal tenderness, stiffness, fatigue, cold intolerance, dry skin, hair loss, depression, poor memory and concentration, and exercise intolerance. Doctors, such as your medical doctor, typically diagnose patients with these symptoms as having "fibromyalgia." The doctors simply fail to understand that for these patients, so-called "normal" amounts of T4 and T3 are woefully inadequate to maintain normal metabolism and health.

So, if you and your medical and chiropractic physicians differ on what to call your condition, both may be right: by current convention among doctors, the term "fibromyalgia" is appropriate. But the underlying mechanism, and the real disorder from which you suffer may be "thyroid hormone resistance." Where both your doctors may be wrong is in believing that the two labels refer to two different disorders. For many patients, the two labels are simply different names for exactly them same condition.

If you do have peripheral thyroid hormone resistance, the treatment for it is pretty straightforward. For almost all patients, effective thyroid hormone treatment involves the use of the thyroid hormone T3 (the plain, non-sustained-release form). Your medical doctor can prescribe this. However, to function normally, resistant peripheral tissues must be exposed to higher than so-called "normal" amounts of thyroid hormone. Although these "supraphysiologic" doses of thyroid hormone usually free patients from their symptoms, they also suppress patients’ TSH levels. This bothers most doctors because the endocrinology specialty has misled them into thinking that TSH suppression is harmful. Nonetheless, for these patients, no TSH suppression means no improvement or recovery.

However, I strongly recommend that you stay under the care of your chiropractic physician. As epidemiological studies have shown, her care (along with massage therapy) is likely to give you palliative improvement of your symptoms until you undergo appropriate metabolic treatment.

If you do have thyroid hormone resistance but can’t get a decisive diagnosis and proper treatment in your home town, we’ll be happy to evaluate you at our clinic and research center. Or, if your local doctors will be cooperative, we may be able to guide you long distance to improvement or recovery. Either way, give Tammy at 603-391-6061.

I hope this answer at least mitigates your confusion to some degree, and that of your doctors as well. Best of luck for a quick recovery from your symptoms, no matter what you choose to call the underlying cause.

July 26, 2007

Question: I recently read a book posted on a website about undiagnosed viruses preventing women from getting pregnant. My husband and I have been trying to get pregnant for three years with no success. I suspect that the book may be right, and I may have a viral infection that is preventing me from getting pregnant. I was on T4-replacement for several years, but I never felt well on it. Because of this, my family doctor switched me to Armour Thyroid. I am now on 2 grains. My TSH level is now suppressed, and this concerns me. But what am I to do? If I have to suppress my TSH level to strengthen my immune system, am I in danger of causing more problems?

Dr. Lowe: It may be true that your inability to become pregnant over the last three years is due to some microbial infection, such as a low-grade, chronic viral infection. Even so, microbial disruption of body functions (maybe fertility included) often results from too little thyroid hormone regulation of the immune system. (I extensively cover the research evidence for this in Chapter 3.13 of The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia).

Many patients free themselves from chronic or recurrent infections by switching from T4-replacement (usually with Synthroid in the US and Canada) and using more effective products such Armour. I’ve been involved with thyroid hormone therapy for the last twenty years. During those years, many times, women patients of mine have became pregnant after switching from T4-replacement to Armour or similar products. Of course, they had to use doses high enough to be effective, not the namby-pamby doses that doctors typically allow their patients to use. Perhaps for some of these women, fertility came about from enhanced immune function from the more effective thyroid hormone therapy.

The 2 grains of Armour you’re taking may seem high to some doctors. However, this wasn’t the case going back some forty years or so ago. Before then, doctors allowed patients to use higher dosages. The dosage range that was safe and effective was generally 2 to 4 grains.

As you can see from this, you’re at the lower end of the historic safe and effective dosage range. In view of this, you may recover strong immune function and fertility simply by gradually and cautiously increasing your dosage of Armour. This may work for you by enhancing your immune system and relieving and infection. On the other hand, it may work simply by better regulating your sex hormone system. For your purposes, it probably doesn’t matter.

Whether your TSH is suppressed or not is, in my opinion, irrelevant; I know of no scientific evidence that a suppressed TSH level will adversely affect you in any way.

July 1, 2007

Question: I am a 41-year-old woman. Five years ago, part of my thyroid gland was surgically removed because of a tumor that turned out to be benign. My TSH level was normal, so my doctor didn’t prescribe thyroid hormone. In the last year, however, some symptoms have come up that seem like hypothyroid symptoms to me, and I’m concerned about them. I’ve gained 50 lbs, my hair is falling out, and white patches have come up on my hands and nose. They bother me because I have a dark complexion. My doctor says the patches are vitiligo. I searched the Internet and found some sites that say vitiligo may be caused by hypothyroidism. Do you think all this means that I have another tumor in my thyroid gland?

Dr. Lowe: I’m sorry about your weight gain and hair loss, and that you’ve developed vitiligo. (For readers who aren’t familiar with vitiligo, it’s a skin condition. It's pronounced vit" l i go, with the last i pronounced as in ice. The patient has smooth, white skin patches on various parts of his or her body. The skin turns white because it loses its natural coloring pigment.) I get inquiries about vitiligo and thyroid disease fairly often, so your concern is shared by some other readers of drlowe.com.

Vitiligo is not associated with a thyroid hormone deficiency per se; instead, it’s associated with autoimmune disease of the thyroid gland. Researchers think vitiligo is itself an autoimmune disease—one that in many people is associated with autoimmune thyroid disease.[1][2]

Your history of thyroid gland disease, weight gain, hair loss, and vitiligo raises the possibility that you now have anti-thyroid antibodies. I think this is more likely than another thyroid gland tumor having formed. Your doctor, of course, should rule out that possibility. But I think autoimmune thyroid disease is far more likely, and I strongly recommend that your doctor measure your thyroid antibody levels.

If you have high antibody levels, you may have become hypothyroid. If so, you may have gained weight and lost hair from your thyroid hormone deficiency. And, your vitiligo may have developed as an autoimmune skin process associated with your autoimmune thyroid disease. Please let me know when you learn whether your thyroid antibodies are high. Best of luck.

References

1. Trbojeviæ, B. and Djurica, S.: Diagnosis of autoimmune thyroid disease. Srp. Arh. Celok. Lek., 133 Suppl 1:25-33, 2005.

2. Niepomniszcze, H. and Amad, R.H.: Skin disorders and thyroid diseases. J. Endocrinol. Invest., 24(8):628-638, 2001.

June 11, 2007

Question:
Thanks for your willingness to answer questions. I was diagnosed as hypothyroid eight years ago. I gained 40 lbs over a few months and I've never lost this. I lost some of it and began to feel better when I was prescribed Armour after four years on synthetic thyroid hormone. I still experience hypo symptoms (constipation, fatigue, etc.), but the symptoms are better since I switched to Armour Thyroid. My doctor, however, says that my labs consistently show that I’m getting too much Armour. I was taking 120 mg when my abdominal swelling began to get worse, I started having trouble breathing, and then brain fog started to slowly creep in. He told me to increase my dosage to 150 mg. But when he saw that my TSH was suppressed, he told me to back off on my dosage again. I did, and now I can’t function at work.

My question is this: Is it possible that my labs indicate high levels of thyroid hormone but I’m really not getting enough?

Dr. Lowe: The answer is a resounding yes! I’ll soon publish a formal study I conducted that bears directly on your question. The study indicates something tragic: Most often, when doctors decide to increase or decrease patients’ dosages of thyroid hormone on the basis of their TSH levels, the doctors make the wrong decisions. Those wrong decisions may well make patients’ symptoms worse. In some cases such as yours, the wrong decisions will disable people from being able to work. Those doctors, then, not only harm their own patients; they also impose unnecessary, burdensome costs on industry and society at large.

Because of this problem, the TSH, in my opinion, is a scourge of modern society. In it’s time, the black plague ruined, disabled, and shortened the lives of millions of people in Europe. Now, studies are showing how doctors are harming patients by relying on their TSH levels. (See my Guttler critique and my critique of T4 vs T4/T3 studies.) When the story fully unfolds, the evidence will show something horrific: that doctors’ reliance on TSH levels has been as devastating to humanity as the black plague was.

What you need, as do all hypothyroid patients, is accurate gauges of whether or not you’re taking enough thyroid hormone. It’s extremely important to your health that you learn that in general, the TSH is not an accurate gauge. You need to assess as accurately as possible how your tissues are responding to a particular dosage of thyroid hormone. You must do this through systematic monitoring. You should regularly monitor and record the intensities of your symptoms. And you should do the same with physiological measures, such as your basal body temperature and the voltage of your EKG.

These types of meaningful measures will most likely help you find your optimal (safe and effective) dosage of thyroid hormone within a fairly short time. Unfortunately, your TSH levels are unlikely to ever enable you to do this.

April 26, 2007

Question: I just read your latest update about your clinic where you do all the testing for metabolism. Didn’t Dr. Broda Barnes simply have people take their temperatures to measure what’s going on in their tissue?

Dr. Lowe: No, he didn't just have them take their temperatures. I’ve had the privilege of having patients who, decades ago, had also been patients of Dr. Barnes. They and I talked at great length about how he assessed and treated them.

Of course, he did use their basal body temperatures. But, according to these patients, their temperatures weren’t the only measures by which he decided whether they needed thyroid hormone and how much they needed. He also physically examined them, tested their Achilles reflexes, and assessed their symptoms. In addition, he looked for other evidence of low thyroid, such as high cholesterol. As a diagnostician, then, he seems to have been as holistic as a doctor could be back then; he appears to have considered all available indicators of hypothyroidism.

No matter what he did or didn’t do, there is a subset of hypothyroid patients for whom the basal body temperature is not a useful gauge of how tissues are responding to thyroid hormone. These people's temperatures don't increase even when they are overstimulated by thyroid hormone. I’ve seen these patients become fully free from symptoms and their metabolic rates become completely normal, yet their temperatures remain abnormally low.

I’ve seen the same with some thyroid hormone resistance patients. I’m one of them. For many years, I’ve taken my optimal dosage of T3, 150 mcg. On this dosage, I no longer have symptoms of thyroid hormone resistance. Those symptoms were mostly mild body aches; treatment-resistant trigger points; poor memory and concentration; and intermittent, severe depression. My latest basal metabolic rate (taken when I woke up from a night’s sleep) was +6%. That means that my metabolic rate was 6% above the calculated normal for me. This is within the 10% plus and minus range that we consider normal. Yet, through all these better years for me, my underarm basal body temperature has remained between 96.7 and 97.2 degrees F. (Dr. Barnes defined the normal basal temperature as 97.8-to-98.2 degrees F.)

The reason some patients’ temperatures remain low is what I call "differential tissue sensitivity to thyroid hormone." I came to this conclusion from many discussions with molecular biologists who do thyroid hormone research. In patients whose temperatures stay low, the temperature-raising enzymes whose gene transcription is increased by thyroid hormone (such as sodium-potassium-ATPase) are apparently partly or wholly exempt from regulation by thyroid hormone. Because of this, the patients’ body temperatures simply aren’t a useful gauge. They must use other physiological measures to assess their tissue responses to a particular dosage of thyroid hormone.

What we do at The Lowe Clinic and Research Center is basically, although more extensively, what Dr. Barnes did: use all available relevant indicators of hypothyroidism. Of course, we also use indicators of thyroid hormone resistance. We have more technological methods today, and we make full use of these. As a research center, we’re studying how useful these methods are and how they can help us to help patients recover as fast as possible.

I believe other doctors caring for thyroid patients should also use multiple assessment methods for three reasons: (1) one or more measures, such as the basal temperature, may not be useful for an individual patient; (2) the more measures that point to hypothyroidism or thyroid hormone resistance, the more confident we can be in the diagnosis; and (3) from multiple abnormal measures, the doctor may learn the type of thyroid hormone product the patient needs.

Of course, during our comprehensive metabolic evaluations, we sometimes identify causes of low metabolism other than too little thyroid hormone regulation. When we do, I tailor an individualized treatment regimen for the patient. Our full evaluations are comprehensive; they include not only the basal body temperature but every other relevant measure available to us today. Because of this, we’re usually able to learn whether a patient is hypometabolic, how low his or her metabolism is, and the most likely cause of the low metabolism. During this process, we find which measures of tissue response to thyroid hormone (and other treatments) will be most useful for the patient and the treating doctor. By providing this information to the doctor and patient, we enable them to systematically judge how the patient’s tissues respond to treatment.

In short, what we’re doing is building on the groundbreaking work of Dr. Broda Barnes. And we’re using every tool we can to carry that work to the highest possible level in the service of our patients.

April 22, 2007

Question: My doctor recently diagnosed me as having hypothyroidism. She prescribed Synthroid. She started me on 50 mcg and then increased it to 75 mcg. Before starting the drug, I’d become a little foggy headed and was tired, which was unusual for me. But after starting it, I became outright miserable. I was depressed for the first time in my life, and I was so tired that I could hardly get out bed. I became constipated, and I could hardly think at all. My thinking was so bad that I was afraid I was going to lose my job. Because the drug made me so miserable and dysfunctional, I stopped it. That was three weeks ago, and I’m starting to feel better now. My doctor is convinced that I had some coincidental illness, and she wants me to start taking Synthroid again. I disagree with her. The relation is just too clear cut. I felt like crap after starting the drug, and after stopping it, I’m feeling better. Do you have any idea why I would react to the drug this way?

Dr. Lowe: First let me say that what you experienced is fairly common. Many patients react to low-dose T4-replacement as you did—badly—regardless of the brand of T4.

There are two potential sources I know of for people feeling awful when they are on T4-replacement. One source is the extremely low dosage that doctors typically prescribe nowadays. A low dose of T4 can effectively reduce TSH secretion. The lower TSH can in turn lower the thyroid gland’s output of thyroid hormone. At the same time, low-dose T4 may not compensate for the thyroid gland’s reduced output of thyroid hormone. The patient then has too little thyroid hormone to properly regulate the metabolism of most of her body’s tissues. She then ends up with abnormally low metabolism and troubling hypothyroid symptoms. I’ve written about this before on drlowe.com.

The second possible reason for your bad reaction to Synthroid is that T4-replacement simply won’t work for you. It doesn’t work for many hypothyroid patients. In a recent study in the United Kingdom, for example, T4-replacement left 50% of patient suffering from hypothyroid symptoms (Saravanan, P., Chau, W.F., Roberts, N., et al.: Psychological well-being in patients on ‘adequate doses of L-thyroxine: results of a large, controlled community-based questionnaire study. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.), 57(5):577-585, 2002.) Unfortunately, through faulty reasoning, these researchers concluded that a much smaller percentage of patients suffered from symptoms despite being on T4-replacement. They are mistaken about the percentage. The evidence is overwhelming that T4-replacement is the lousiest approach to thyroid hormone therapy. I’ve documented the widespread failures of the approach in two critiques:

http://www.drlowe.com/frf/guttler/intro.htm

http://www.drlowe.com/frf/t4replacement/intro.htm

Odds are, if you cooperate with your doctor and try T4-replacement again, you’ll waste time trying to get well. Moreover, you’ll most likely react badly again. T4-Replacement forsakes many patients. But most patients recover quickly with T4/T3 products such as Armour Thyroid, Westhroid, and Naturthroid, and with T3 alone—as long as the patients use high enough doses of the products. If your doctor will cooperate and treat you with one of these products and ignore your TSH level, you’re not likely to have another bad reaction to thyroid hormone therapy. Instead, other factors held constant, you can, I believe, expect a highly positive treatment outcome.

April 21, 2007

Question: I was taking vitamins, but I didn’t see that they were helping me, so I stopped. I just don’t see why you push nutritional supplements so much on your website and in your books. Do you make money off them?

Dr. Lowe: First let me say that unlike many doctors, I have no vested financial interest whatever in any nutritional product. Nor do I resort to the ploy that I donate royalties from supplements to charity. I don’t sell them or profit from them financially in any way.

That issue aside, I’d like to address an issue that could make all the difference in you being relatively healthy and youthful throughout your life. Many patients have told me they felt much better after they started taking nutritional supplements. I even know of a few people whose fibromyalgia and other hypothyroid-like symptoms ceased after they started taking supplements.

Conversely, many people who begin taking supplement for the first time see no dramatic benefits over night. That seems true for you. That being the case, rather than you abandoning supplements, I encourage you to consider the subtle benefits of taking them.

Take, for example, the reduction of free radicals in your body. These are atoms or molecules that have unpaired electrons in their outer shells. These unpaired electrons make the atoms or molecules extremely reactive. They are so reactive that they set off rapid chain reactions. These destabilize other molecules and produce many more free radicals. Antioxidants available in supplements deactivate free radicals.

Anti-aging experts have long argued that free radicals are the main agents of aging. Reduce your body’s free radical content, they argue, and you’ll age more slowly and maintain a more youthful appearance, even into old age.

I had the opportunity to witness a case in point when I was in chiropractic college. Once a month, I attended a meeting of a health organization in Los Angeles. Another often attendee was the beautiful silent-movie actress Gloria Swanson. She was an avid health enthusiast. So was her last husband, William Duffy. He wrote the famous book Sugar Blues, a vade mecum of John Lennon and other anti-sugar advocates. One author wrote, "Gloria was insane about the use of sugar. I mean she would go ballistic if someone used it around her. She claimed that America lost the Vietnam War because of sugar."

Gloria was seventy-five-years-old then, but she was youthful and beautiful enough to hold the attention of most of the men at the meetings—despite the presence of much younger attractive women. Had any of us guys had the chance to leave the meeting with one of the women, it would’ve been Gloria.

Nutrients such as vitamin C reduce free radicals in our bodies. But while they are doing this, no flashing neon gauge pops into the forefront of our minds with a needle telling us how low our free radicals have dropped. We have no immediately perceptual gauge that lets us how much we’ve benefited. But despite that, benefited we indeed have.

What I recommend is that you study credible nutritional literature and come to understand the subtle ways that various supplements can help you over the long haul. You can get high-quality supplements for a modest price, and ingest them quickly each day. The price and time are well worth many the subtle benefits you’re likely to get from them over the years. For example, you may avoid dying of heart disease, and you may stave off cancer. And, at seventy or eighty years old, you may well turn young men’s heads the way Gloria Swanson did mine.

March 9, 2007

Question: My doctor said he wouldn’t mind treating my fibromyalgia with thyroid hormone, but first he has to have proof that your approach is scientific. I loaned him my copy of Your Guide to Metabolic Health, but he said that what he wants is  more "academic proof." I asked what he meant by that and he said "studies and journal articles." If you have that kind of proof, can you send it to me so I can let him see that you are scientific?

Dr. Lowe: I understand your doctor’s concern for what he calls "academic proof." He seems to be oriented toward what we call "evidence-based medicine." I, too, am oriented that way, so I appreciate what he’s asking for.

What I first recommend is that you download and print (doing so is free) the two studies I completed and published late last year. These studies provided the final pieces of the puzzle we call "fibromyalgia." The two studies alone should convince your doctor of the scientific credibility of my main argument about fibromyalgia: that too little thyroid hormone regulation causes most patients’ symptoms. Below are the links to the two published studies. You can download them as pdf files and give them to your doctor:

Report at Medical Science Monitor:

 
http://www.medscimonit.com/medscimonit/modules.php?name=Current_Issue&d_op=summary&id=8851

Report at Thyroid Science: http://www.thyroidscience.com/experiments.htm

Of course, we have summaries of our previous studies online at drlowe.com. I included the full text of these other studies in an appendix of my book The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia. I recommend that you get a copy of this book and share it with your doctor. In the book, I cover every aspect of fibromyalgia—massively documenting from the scientific literature the relationship  of each aspect of fibromyalgia to hypothyroidism and peripheral thyroid hormone resistance. By looking at the reference sections of the chapters, your doctor will see that I backed up my arguments with more than 6,000 references to scientific publications.

Oddly, many patients have told me that merely the impressive appearance of this hardback book, The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia, has melted their doctors’ resistance to treating them with thyroid hormone. I would prefer, of course, that the book’s contents rather than its appearance convince doctors that my approach is scientific. But then, many doctors have told me that they first tested my treatment approach in their practices. When they got positive results with their patients, only then did they go back to the book. They read it in earnest and discovered that the treatment that works for their patients is, indeed, scientifically based.

I can’t really argue that a doctor should come to the truth about fibromyalgia through reading rather than by clinical experience. What’s most important is that they arrive at the truth—not how they happen to get there.

February 22, 2007

Question:
My doctor diagnosed low cortisol and has me taking 20 mg of cortisol each day. I am concerned about taking too much, but she told me that 20 mg is a safe dose. What are the symptoms of too much cortisol so that I can watch for them? How much cortisol is too much?

Dr. Lowe: I have included below a list of the symptoms, signs, and test results when patients have severe excess cortisol. Keep in mind that factors other than excess cortisol can cause most of these symptoms, signs, and test results. Because of this, just because you have one or more of these features  doesn’t necessarily mean you’re taking too much cortisol.

Also bear in mind that what is too much cortisol for a patient is an individual matter: What is too much for one patient may be too little for another, and vice versa. Moreover, some patients’ tissues are partially resistant to cortisol, and they have to maintain a higher body level of cortisol than others to be free from cortisol deficiency symptoms and signs. Cortisol resistance is now a scientifically established disorder, but I don’t believe researchers have established the incidence in the population. If a patient suspects he has cortisol resistance, it is crucial that he work with a doctor who is knowledgeable about the disorder and experienced in working with cortisol resistance patients.

My treatment team has worked with some patients who over medicated themselves with cortisol. The patients developed the symptoms and signs of cortisol excess only after several months of taking very large daily doses—several times the 20 mg you’re taking.

As I said, though, how patients respond to different doses of cortisol is an individual matter. Because of this, it’s hard to say what will be excessive for any particular patient. However, it is important for patients to stay within the range considered “physiologic” rather than “pharmacologic.”

“Pharmacologic” refers to the large doses of cortisol analogues (such as prednisone) that doctors use—hopefully briefly—to suppress inflammation. Pharmacologic doses are often used to treat conditions such as severe acute asthma.

“Physiologic” refers to maintaining a body level of cortisol that the adrenal cortices would maintain, were they capable of doing so. One aim, then, of physiologic cortisol therapy is to give the patient just enough cortisol to make up for what his adrenal cortices should be but aren’t providing.

Because of individual variability, it’s best for each patient to work with a knowledgeable doctor to decide what is for that patient a physiologic dose. But I agree with your doctor: your dosage of 20 mg is mostly likely well within the harmless physiologic range.

Symptoms, Signs, and Test Results in Cortisol Excess
O Weakness O Reduced resistance to infection
O Muscle wasting O Edema
O Poor wound healing O Easy bruising
O Obesity of the trunk of the body O Purple striae (stripes) on the abdomen
O Fat pads above the collar bones O Fat collection at the junction of the back of neck and upper back ("buffalo hump")
O Skin that is thin and atropic O Plethoric (overfull, turgid, inflated) appearance
O Rounded "moon" face O High sodium & low potassium levels
O Psychological disturbance such as mood swings O Slender arms and fingers and legs and toes
O Glucose intolerance O Excessive hair growth (hirshutism)
O Kidney stones O Menstrual irregularities such as amenorrhoea (absence of periods)
O Osteoporosis O High blood pressure

January 4, 2007

Question: My daughter is now 12 and was born without a thyroid—at least that's what everyone thinks. Her TSH was over 730 at birth and again two weeks later, so she has been on Synthroid since. She has grown in height very well but has always been overweight. She was also diagnosed with celiac disease a year ago. We have switched endocrinologists several times because they just don't seem to hear what we are saying. In addition, she had hallucinations and depression a few years ago and is now on Zoloft. I am convinced that most of this has to do with the thyroid. The reason is that both times her levels of TSH were checked, they were high. But her doctors assured me the high TSH levels didn't have anything to do with her symptoms, although what I read contradicts this. My daughter also sees a pediatric GI specialist and must take Miralax, a drug for constipation, every day to keep her regular. Before that, she would go a very long times between going to the bathroom. I am now taking her to another doctor that is not an endocrinologist but will hopefully look a her T3, too. My daughter is an intelligent 12-year-old girl. She is overweight. She does exercise a little and watches her diet. Currently she is on 0.175 mg Synthroid, and her TSH is 0.14. She clearly still exhibits some hypothyroid symptoms. What do you think?

Dr. Lowe: I sincerely regret that your daughter has had to begin life as you describe. From your description, her plight is similar to millions of other patients who continue to suffer because of the ineffectiveness and harm of T4-replacement therapy. In the United States, of course, because of highly effective marketing—not scientific evidence!—T4-replacement usually includes the use of Synthroid.

It is entirely plausible that your daughter’s symptoms are caused by the ineffectiveness of Synthroid. Depression, constipation, and being overweight despite watching her diet and exercising are typical of patients on T4-replacement with Synthroid. Also, it is well documented that some patients have hallucinations and other psychotic symptoms due to their hypothyroidism.[1][2][3][4]

I think your daughter will have the best chance of developing normally and having a healthy and happy life if she takes a constructive step: switching from T4-replacement to a more effective approach to thyroid hormone therapy. For most hypothyroid patients that means switching to a T4/T3 combination product. Some patients, however, must use plain T3 alone. Her TSH levels suggests that her dosage of Synthroid is too low; with dosages high enough to lower the TSH to the bottom of the reference range enable them to recover. However, many patients fail to benefit from Synthroid no matter how high the dosage. Most of these patients then recover after switching to a more effective thyroid hormone product.

As I said, your daughter's constipation may be caused by the ineffectiveness of Synthroid. However, it might also be caused or complicated by a deficiency of indigestible fiber in her diet. On the other hand, the major GI effect of untreated or undertreated hypothyroidism is constipation, so it is extremely important to consider that her constipation may be caused by the ineffectiveness of Synthroid.

Your said that your daughter is taking Miralax for her constipation. This, of course, is polyethylene glycol. I personally wouldn't let my daughter take this for constipation without first making sure she has a wholesome diet that contains enough indigestible fiber and switching her to a more effective approach to thyroid therapy. Please give your daughter my very best wishes for soon recovering from her symptoms.

References

1. Bhatara, V., Alshari, M.G., Warhol, P., et al.: Coexistent hypothyroidism, psychosis, and severe obsessions in an adolescent: a 10-year follow-up. J. Child. Adolesc. Psychopharmacol., 14(2):315-323, 2004.

2. Heinrich, T.W. and Grahm, G.: Hypothyroidism Presenting as Psychosis: Myxedema Madness Revisited. Prim. Care Companion J. Clin. Psychiatry, 5(6):260-266, 2003.

3. Kut'ko, I.I. and Kostenko, L.P.: A case of thyroid encephalopathy with a hallucinatory-paranoid syndrome. Lik. Sprava, (9):97-99, 1993.

4. Kleu, G. and Schulte, D.: Course and substitution therapy in acute myxedema hallucinosis. Contribution on multidimensional psychopathologic functional diagnosis. Nervenarzt, 42(3):148-152, 1971.

December 10, 2006

Question:
I am a 46-year-old woman who has been hypothyroid for twenty years. The general practitioner who diagnosed my hypothyroidism put me on Thyrolar. I did well on that for years. When I saw an endocrinologist for another problem, she took me off the Thyrolar and prescribed Synthroid. She told me that Synthroid was the standard of practice. Within three months, I had gained fifteen pounds and was severely depressed. My general practitioner prescribed an antidepressant for the depression and told me to exercise more to lose the weight. Out of frustration, I found a new general practitioner, and he prescribed Armour Thyroid. Six weeks later, my weight was down and the depression was gone.

About a month after I started the Armour, a new problem came over me. My joints became swollen and painful. My finger and wrist joints are worse, but my shoulder and hip joints also hurt. A rheumatologist who gave me a cortisone shot, and the pain was gone for about a week. When the pain came back, he told me to take ibuprofen to keep the pain down. I’m doing that, but my joints still hurt and I’m afraid of side effects of the ibuprofen. Do you think I became allergic to something in the Armour? Should I switch back to the synthetic hormone in Synthroid to see if that makes the pain go away?


Dr. Lowe:
I'm sorry you have joint swelling and pain, and that you’re confused about what brought it on. I think it is highly unlikely that you’re allergic to anything in the Armour pills. A way to eliminate that possibility, however, is to take an antihistamine that you know is effective for you. If the antihistamine makes the swelling and pain go away, stop the antihistamine. If the swelling and pain return, start the antihistamine again. If the symptoms again subside or fully go away, you can be confident that an allergy is causing the symptoms.

As I said, though, I think that’s not likely. I have two reasons for saying this. First, the rheumatologist’s cortisone injection stopped the swelling and pain for a time. Cortisone is an anti-inflammatory drug, and because it stopped the swelling and pain, the cause is most likely inflammation.

My second reason for saying an allergy isn’t likely the cause of the symptoms is more important. That reason is that I've had many patients who had essentially the same history as you. They had joint swelling and pain after switching to a more effective thyroid hormone therapy. (Most often, patients had switched from a T4-only product, such as Synthroid or Levoxyl, a T4/T3 product such as Armour, Westhroid, or Naturthroid, or to T3 alone.) I then diagnosed a cortisol deficiencies through salivary free cortisol testing. Next, we corrected their deficiencies with physiologic cortisol therapy, and this eliminated their joint swelling and pain.

If you’re truly like those patients, what probably happened to you is this: Synthroid was not effective enough to keep your liver’s metabolism at a normal rate. Because of this, your liver sluggishly cleared cortisol from your blood. For some reason, the cortex of your adrenal glands can’t produce a normal amount of cortisol. But, using Synthroid and only slowly clearing cortisol out through your liver, you still had enough cortisol in your body to inhibit inflammation.

But when you switched to Armour, it sped up your liver’s metabolism. As a result, your liver began clearing cortisol from your body more quickly. But your adrenal glands can’t produce enough cortisol to make up for the larger amount your liver is clearing from your body. Because of this, the faster clearance has lowered your body’s cortisol too far. Having too little of this anti-inflammatory hormone has led to your symptoms: joints that are swollen and painful from inflammation set off the mechanical stresses of joint movement and weight bearing.

If a cortisol deficiency has caused your joint swelling and pain, switching back to Synthroid is not the prudent course of action. Synthroid might free you from the joint swelling and pain by letting your liver again clear cortisol from your body too sluggishly. But you would most likely gain weight again and sink back into depressed. What is prudent is to stay on Armour Thyroid, which is more effective for you. Then confirm that you have a cortisol deficiency, and correct it by using physiologic cortisol therapy.

October 26, 2006

Question:
On my own, I took too much Armour Thyroid. I went up to twice what my endocrinologist told me to take. Eight days later, I got terribly overstimulated. I was trembling, sweating, short of breath, and my heart was beating really fast. When I phoned and told the endocrinologist’s assistant, he called me back reprimanded me, but I was surprised that he was very kind about it. I appreciate that because I had trouble finding an endocrinologist who would prescribe Armour, and I was afraid he would stop treating me. He told me not to worry about it but to learn a lesson about taking too much. He called in a prescription for propranolol tablets, a beta-blocker, to stop the trembling and other symptoms, and he said to take it every four hours. My question concerns what happens during the four hours after I take the propranolol. When I take it, the symptoms stop for three hours, and then they flare up. I mean flare way up. I tremble, sweat, and my heart beats faster than it did before I started taking the medicine two days ago. Why would the symptoms come back worse than before?

Dr. Lowe: Two possibilities come to mind. First, you said your symptoms of overstimulation started eight days after you doubled your Armour dosage. It’s possible that the T4 in the Armour you took over the eight days is now being released in increased amounts from the transport proteins in the blood. These proteins can bind T4 for up to two weeks, gradually releasing it. If so, your cells are probably converting to T3 the increased amount of T4 that’s reaching them, increasing the T3 inside the cells. And, of course, your symptoms of overstimulation may be the result of the increased amounts of T3.

The second possibility is a "rebound" of your excessive metabolic rate (hypermetabolism) and symptoms of thyrotoxicosis. The T3 in the Armour, along with the T3 from the converted T4, will have increased the number of beta-adrenergic receptors on your cells’ membranes. When adrenaline and noradrenaline bind to the increased number of beta-adrenergic receptors, the metabolic rate of your cells speeds up.

When the propranolol binds to the beta receptors, however, this prevents adrenaline and noradrenaline from binding to them. By blocking adrenaline and noradrenaline from binding to the receptors, these hormones can’t speed up your metabolism—not until the dose of propranolol runs its course and vacates the receptors, leaving the receptors for the hormones to bind to again. It’s possible that, when the dose of propranolol is expended, and adrenaline and noradrenaline bind to the beta receptors again, your cells’ response to the binding is exaggerated—causing your cellular metabolism to flare.

It’s fairly common for patients resistant to thyroid hormone to experience rebounding in the opposite direction. They must use T3 to improve. The onset and offset of the metabolic effects of T3 are fast compared to that of T4. They usually occur within one-to-three days, but sometimes in half a day. Some patients occasionally take too much T3 and get mildly overstimulated. As a result, some of them suddenly stop taking T3 altogether. When they do, the fast offset of its effects causes a rebounding of their symptoms of slow metabolism. Their fatigue, sluggishness, and slow heart rate, for example, can overcome them with a severity worse than before they began taking T3.

Rebounding is an important concept to understand. A grasp of the concept can make sense out of the effects of stopping many medications too quickly. To make sure rebounding is clear to you, consider something I experienced just before I read your email.

I found your email this morning when I went online to AskDrLowe@drlowe.com. When I read your description of what’s happened to you—which sounds like rebound hypermetabolism—it reminded me of what happened just before I turned on my computer and went online.

We had a snow storm last night here in Boulder, Colorado. When I woke up an hour ago, it was still dark. I looked out a window and saw snow deeply covering the trees, shrubs, my car, and everything else in sight. The house was chilly, so I came downstairs to where I write and started a fire in the mouth of our big, black potbelly stove. I twisted some paper, laid it in the stove, piled sticks over it, and placed a log over them. I lit the paper and it burned for a couple of minutes and ignited the sticks into flames. When the paper had turned to ashes, the sticks burned for a couple of minutes longer and then turned to embers, with only a few small flames remaining. I leaned toward the embers and sent a long breath of air toward them. When I did, my breath put out the flames, but the oxygen in the air made the embers glow brightly. A moment later, when I freed the embers from my breath, their glow faded, and the flames rebounded—they leapt up under the log and spread up and out over its sides, far higher and more active than before.

In my mind, this rebounding of the flames—flaring higher than before my flame-suppressing breath—is like the flare up of your symptoms of overstimulation after a suppressive dose of propranolol. This is assuming, of course, that this second possibility is the culprit. If it is, your endocrinologist may have you take your dose of propranolol every three hours instead of every four. I suggest that you ask him if that’s right for you. From your description of him, it sounds like he’ll be happy to do whatever works for you.

October 21, 2006

Comment from Kansas City Patient:
Dr. Lowe, you are right in that treating thyroid with something other than T4 IS INDEED CORRECT. Compounded T3 is the ONLY thing, and I repeat, ONLY, that has gotten me on my feet after 6 years of misery. THANK YOU FOR WHAT YOU'RE DOING!

Dr. Lowe: Thank you so much for your email. Few things give me more pleasuring than hearing from people like yourself. Thankfully, I’ve heard from many hundreds who have improved or recovered by switching from T4-replacement to T4/T3 combinations or, as in your case, T3 alone.

I get almost as much pleasure from hearing that more and more doctors are treating their patients with these more effective alternatives to T4-replacement. Among those doctors are a growing number of endocrinologists, especially younger ones. I'm hopeful that this trend means we're beginning to emerge from the dark age of thyroid hormone therapy of the last thirty-five years.

Congratulations on your successful treatment with compounded T3, and thanks again for letting me know. All best wishes to you for reaching optimal metabolic health.

July 15, 2006

Question:
My doctor uses my TSH and thyroid hormone levels to change my dose of thyroid hormone. He measures them every couple of months and has me increase or decrease my dose, depending on these little changes in the hormone levels. He calls it "fine tuning" my dosage. Personally I don’t see any change in how I feel even when he increases my dose a little. I just keep feeling tired, achy, and depressed. He seems convinced that by measuring my levels and making these little dosage changes that he’ll some day get rid of my symptoms. From reading your website, I don’t believe he’s on the right track. What do you think I should tell him to get him to use another approach?

Dr. Lowe: First I suggest that you ask your doctor to question the scientific basis of the endocrinologists’ notion of "fine tuning" by TSH and thyroid hormone levels. If he does, he’ll learn that the changes he sees in your TSH and thyroid hormone levels are probably nothing more than natural variations in the levels. He would probably see the same variations if he always kept your thyroid hormone dose the same. I’ll briefly review some of the evidence that your doctor should read.

TSH levels don’t significantly correlate day-to-day[1] or week-to-week.[2] One research group measured the TSH and free T3 and free T4 levels of ten normal young men.[3] When they measured the levels every 30 minutes for 24 hours, they found that the hormone levels were lower during the day and higher at night. During the day, the free T3 was 15% lower, the free T4 was 7% lower, and the TSH was 140% lower. When the researchers measured the hormone levels every five minutes for six to seven hours (7 PM-to-11 PM), the levels varied every thirty minutes. The TSH level varied 13%, the free T3 15%, and the free T4 11%.

Other researchers measured the TSH levels of 31 healthy people. They found that women had significantly higher TSH level than men.[1] On different days, individuals had "a large" variation of TSH levels. The large variations were about equally extreme in both men and women. The researchers concluded, "The present study demonstrated a large variation of TSH levels in various conditions, even in the same individuals, indicating the necessity of strictly controlled conditions in the study of TSH secretion."

Another research group measured TSH and thyroid hormone levels in normal people every month for a year. They found that in individuals, the levels of thyroid hormone varied within narrow limits. But among the people as a group, the levels varied considerably. The researchers wrote, "This high degree of individuality implies that rigorous comparison of thyroid hormone results against a population-based 'normal range' can be potentially misleading." They also reported higher T3 and T4 levels in winter months. During these months, the pituitary gland’s secretion of TSH was more easily provoked.[6]

Other researchers woke people on two nights. They then let the people to go back to sleep so that they wouldn’t be totally deprived of sleep. From partially depriving the people of sleep, their TSH levels significantly increased and remained elevated throughout the following day."[4]

Many endocrinologists talk of using the TSH and thyroid hormone levels to "fine tune" hypothyroid patients’ thyroid hormone dosages. Considering how much the hormone levels vary, however, it’s obvious that the concept of fine tuning is mistaken. For the sake of their patients’ health, endocrinologists should promptly abandon the notion. This is unlikely, though, due to financial inducements the endocrinology specialty receives from corporations that profit from doctors endlessly ordering the hormone levels to "fine tune" their patients dosages. Hopefully, though, you can use the scientific evidence to persuade your doctor to use a safer and more effective approach with you. More on this topic

References

1. Sakaue, K.: Studies on the factors affecting serum thyrotropin levels in healthy controls and on the thyroid function in depressed patients using a highly sensitive immunoassay. Nippon Naibunpi GakkaiZasshi, 66(10):1094-1107, 1990.

2. Kraus, R.P., Phoenix, E., Edmonds, M.W., et al.: Exaggerated TSHresponses to TRH in depressed patients with 'normal' baselineTSH. J. Clin. Psychiatry, 58(6):266-270, 1997.

3. Weeke, J. and Gundersen, H.J.: Circadian and 30 minutes variations in serum TSH and thyroid hormones in normal subjects. ActaEndocrinol. (Copenh.), 89(4):659-672, 1978.

4. Baumgartner, A., Dietzel, M., Saletu, B., et al.: Influence of partial sleep deprivation on the secretion of thyrotropin, thyroid hormones, growth hormone, prolactin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, and estradiol in healthy young women. PsychiatryRes., 48(2):153-178, 1993.

5. Ain, K.B., Pucino, F., Shiver, T.M., et al.: Thyroid hormone levels affected by time of blood sampling in thyroxine-treated patients.Thyroid, 3(2):81-85, 1993.

6. Harrop JS, Ashwell K, Hopton MR. Circannual and within-individual variation of thyroid function tests in normal subjects. Ann Clin Biochem. 1985 Jul;22 ( Pt 4):371-5.

July 6, 2006

Question:
I am a 56-year-old female retired teacher and was recently diagnosed with fibromyalgia. Recently, I had an MRI for spinal arthritis and it showed a 6-cm mass behind my breast bone. I had most of my thyroid gland removed 24 years ago for a benign tumor. They left a small remnant of thyroid tissue, and I have not had to take thyroid medication. When the doctors found the mass, they had no idea that it might be related to my thyroid gland. To figure out what the mass is, the doctors did another MRI and a CAT scan. They found that the mass is pressing on my trachea and distorting its shape a little. After an ultrasound-guided biopsy, a pathologist said that the mass is thyroid tissue. My family doctor said it is a "substernal thyroid," which means behind my breastbone, and I need no followup. I looked up substernal thyroid on the internet and found that surgery is needed. Was my family doctor correct in stating that I need no followup? He has referred me to an endocrinologist to review my thyroid lab test results, and this seems like a followup.

Dr. Lowe: First, let’s deal with your diagnosis of fibromyalgia. Most patients’ fibromyalgia symptoms are caused mainly by too little thyroid hormone regulation. That this is true is strongly supported by two new studies by our research group that journals will publish this next week or so. Most doctors are unaware that hypothyroidism underlies many patients "fibromyalgia" symptoms. Because they aren't aware, they're not likely to make the connection in you. In that you have fibromyalgia symptoms, I respectfully disagree with your family doctor that you don’t need followup. Chances are, you need thyroid hormone therapy—but I don’t mean the T4-replacement that your family doctor and the endocrinologist are likely to prescribe.

Many people, of course, undergo thyroid gland removal and are left with only residual thyroid tissue. Probably most of them soon afterward develop hypothyroid symptoms, such as "fibromyalgic" pain. You may have remained symptom free for years because your substernal thyroid provided you with enough thyroid hormone to ward off symptoms. Recently, however, your residual and/or substernal thyroid tissue may have became impaired and is producing less thyroid hormone. A lower hormone level may have left you with hypothyroid symptoms that your doctor diagnosed as fibromyalgia.

If you are bothered by the substernal thyroid tissues pressing into your trachea, something needs to be done to relieve the pressure. Most likely, though, that something doesn't have to be surgery. Instead, you can probably shrink the thyroid tissue by taking enough thyroid hormone to suppress your TSH level. A reduced TSH level would decrease stimulation of your thyroid tissue and cause it to atrophy. As the tissue atrophies, its pressure on your trachea should decrease or cease altogether.

Typically, endocrinologists discourage patients from taking TSH-suppressive doses of thyroid hormone. They warn that such doses will harm patients. The alternative they recommend is T4-replacement therapy. But in T4-replacement, the patient's dose of T4 keeps her TSH level within the reference range. This amount of TSH would probably keep your substernal thyroid tissue from shrinking; if so, it would fail to serve your purpose—to reduce or fully relieve the pressure on your trachea. Then, to relieve the pressure, the endocrinologist and your family doctor may recommend what they mistakenly believe to be safer than suppressing your TSH level—surgery.

I know a woman in the UK who became a thyroid patient advocate after she underwent surgery rather than using a TSH-suppressive dose of thyroid hormone. She had steadily-enlarging thyroid tissue in her tongue, and her  tongue had became uncomfortably swollen. Surgical removal of the thyroid tissue mutilated her tongue. TSH-suppressive doses of thyroid hormone would probably have harmlessly caused the tissue to atrophy, relieving the tongue swelling. But she learned of this option only after the surgery. She was justifiably outraged and became an thyroid patient advocate; she now helps rescue patients from the ineffectiveness and harms of T4-replacement.

Your doctors may tell you that taking enough thyroid hormone to suppress your TSH is likely to cause a heart attack or reduced your bone mineral density. But the doctors won’t—because they can’t—reconcile this warning with a well-documented fact: that tens of thousands of thyroid cancer patients live for many years on TSH-suppressive doses of thyroid hormone with no harmful effects whatever. Study after study has shown this to be true. Of course, there is the rare patient for whom TSH-suppression is contraindicated. You may be one of these. If so, you may be able to find a compromise dose of thyroid hormone, one that reduces the size of your substernal thyroid just enough to reduce the pressure but doesn't harm you.

I recommend that you find a physician who’ll treat you with thyroid hormone with the aim safely shrinking your substernal thyroid tissue. Despite the thug tactics of some endocrinologists, steadily more physicians in other specialties are abandoning T4-replacement, which isn’t likely to shrink your thyroid tissue. These doctors are using other approaches to thyroid hormone therapy that are truly safe and effective. Your chances of finding one of these physicians are increasing every day, and I hope you find one soon.

July 4, 2006

Question:
I am a general practitioner in Australia who treats many hypothyroid patients. My question is, can a hypothyroid patient benefit from using a MedGem calorimeter at home to assist in adjusting her dosage of thyroid medication? I have a patient who lives in a desolate region of Australia. She can travel to my clinic only every three months or so, and it seems that she could use the MedGem at home and provide me with the results. Can you advise me on whether it would be of benefit for her to have one?

Dr. Lowe: For a patient to measure his or her resting metabolic rate at home, the best option was the MedGem. Unfortunately, the company that marketed it, HealtheTech, has dissolved. The portability of the MedGem, of course, was an advantage over other calorimeters. Occasionally, we’ve had a patient in our clinic who couldn’t relax enough for us to get his or her true resting metabolic rate. We would teach the patient how to use the MedGem and let him or her take the instrument to the motel (most of our patients come from out-of-town) and use it upon awakening. That way, we were able to get a reading that was closer to a true resting rate.

Now patients who want their metabolic rates measured must find clinicians who use another indirect calorimeter, Korr’s instrument called "ReeVue." An advantage of the ReeVue calorimeter is that it is better designed for clinic use than was the MedGem. The ReeVue is thereby free from some problems the MedGem imposed, such as the patient having to hold the calorimeter during the test.

If you are interested in obtaining a ReeVue calorimeter or finding another clinician who uses one and can measure your patient’s metabolic rate, you can email our contact person at Korr, Shelley Steward at sstewart@korr.com.

May 20, 2006

Question:
I was at a local medical meeting last night where "alternative thyroid hormone therapy" was a topic of discussion. One physician was quite offensive in his comments about your reports that fibromyalgia patients need thyroid hormone treatment. As best I could determine, he has never read any of your books or your website. Neither had a couple of other physicians who seemed to agree that you're some sort of dirt ball for spreading false information. Incidentally, I’ve read your books, your website, and your research articles. I respect your work and defended you at the meeting. Having an interest in your work and you as a character, I’m curious about how you take being unjustly bashed by others?

Dr. Lowe: You may know that I’m a devout critical rationalist, and as such, I welcome and appreciate constructive criticism. "Being unjustly bashed," however, is another matter.

I only rarely hear that someone has unfairly castigated me for my unconventional views. Whenever I do, I take solace in a statement by J. Paul Getty, whose unconventional views in business during the depression helped make him once the richest man in the world. Based on his personal experience, he wrote: "In business, as in politics, it is never easy to go against the beliefs and attitudes held by the majority. The businessman who moves counter to the tide of prevailing opinion must expect to be obstructed, derided, and damned."

The same is true in medicine and research. The consistent pressure is to conform to conventional beliefs. When one declines to do so, the reactions of some physicians and researchers are far less than cordial. Some of us, however, are stubbornly committed to unearthing and spreading the truth. This make it impossible for us to conform when doing so will violate what we believe to be the truth. Fortunately, over time, I’ve become inured to derision; today, it’s more amusing to me than punitive.

May 18, 2006

Question:
I am an internist. I had fibromyalgia symptoms for ten years, and interestingly, I developed Hashimoto’s about the time my fibromyalgia symptoms came on. For that ten years, I took the brand of T4 advertised most aggressively to physicians. My pain and fatigue tormented me so much that I could hardly practice until I switched to Armour Thyroid. Since I’ve been on 3 grains, I’ve had hardly any pain and I now have normal energy. With the information on your website, I’ve begun treating some of my fibromyalgia patients with Armour and some with T3. For the most part, the results are just as you claim, and I’m amazed at the positive results, although I know I have a lot to learn. I just ordered your book The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia so that I can gain and in depth understanding of your approach. I have just one concern, and that’s my low TSH, and my patients’ low TSH levels, on the Armour. Should I be concerned about the low TSH levels?

Dr. Lowe: For years, I’ve received emails from physicians such as you, and to my satisfaction, the number is increasing. As I say to most of the physicians, I sincerely regret that you suffered needlessly. Many millions of other people still suffer for the same reason—being on T4-replacement and expecting it to work well. Of course, recent studies show that T4-replacement is ineffective for and harmful to many patients. But personal experience seems the best teacher. And although I regret that you suffered so long before you switched to Armour, I’m sure your patients will benefit immensely from your personal experience.

You mentioned that you’ve ordered The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia. I discuss suppression of the TSH in many parts of the book. However, to gain a thorough understanding of how the endocrinology specialty has misled the medical profession about TSH-suppressive doses of thyroid hormone, I refer you to Chapter 4.4, pages 859-898. The chapter’s title is "Adverse Effects of Excessive and Inadequate Thyroid Hormone." You’ll find that in that chapter—as in every chapter of the book—I use scientific evidence and logical discourse to show the truth of the matter. This approach, of course, differs distinctly from the endocrinology specialty’s scientifically-groundless, commercially-driven ex cathedra pronouncements about TSH suppression.

Our treatment team uses the TSH level only initially to help clarify a patient’s thyroid status. But during treatment, we completely ignore the level. The reason is that the TSH level is totally irrelevant to normalizing the patient’s whole body metabolism and relieving his or her suffering. The only clinical value of the TSH level is to see the effect of a particular dose of thyroid hormone on the pituitary gland’s "thyrotroph" (TSH-secreting) cells.

The thyrotroph cells are vastly more sensitive to thyroid hormone than are other body cells. Some endocrinologists argue that we know the ratio of two sensitivities: that is, the ratio of the sensitivity of the pituitary to a dose of thyroid hormone to the sensitivity of other tissues to that dose. From knowledge of that ratio, they argue, we can use the TSH to gauge the thyroid hormone dose that properly regulates the metabolism of all body cells. 

The problem is that for individual patients, we don’t know that ratio. These endocrinologists fail to realize that statistical inferences from large groups of patients do not tell us specifically enough what we need to know clinically about individual patients.

Because the pituitary is far more sensitive than other tissues to thyroid hormone—and just how much more sensitive in individual patients, we do not know!—we can’t reliably deduce the effects of a particular dose of thyroid hormone on most body cells from the effect of that dose on the pituitary thyrotroph cells.

The near impossibility of this deduction being valid is made clear by many studies in the field of thyroid hormone resistance. The studies show that in many patients, various tissues differ in how sensitively they respond to a particular dose of thyroid hormone. That is, not all tissues respond to the same dose of thyroid hormone with the same vigor. Hence, from an individual patient’s TSH level, we can reliably validly deduce nothing about the effects of a thyroid hormone dose on tissue cells other than the pituitary thyrotrophs.

You may find it helpful to keep in mind a clear-cut double standard of the endocrinology specialty. Endocrinologists keep thousands of thyroid cancer patients on TSH-suppressive doses of thyroid hormone. But these specialists vociferously warn of grave dangers if hypothyroid patients use the same TSH-suppressive doses. However, meta-analyses of studies show that these doses are harmless to thyroid cancer patients, despite them staying on the doses for decades. Rather than harming the cancer patients, TSH-suppressive doses appear to benefit them: researchers write that the patients report feeling better on these doses than hypothyroid patients do on T4-replacement. (In T4-replacement, of course, the patient uses a dose of thyroid hormone that doesn't suppress the TSH.)

The endocrinology specialty cannot reconcile this discrepancy in its practice guidelines for the two different groups of patients. This to me is one of many pieces of evidence that T4-replacement is driven by commerce—not by science or an aim for therapeutic effectiveness. I provide rock-hard evidence for this conclusion in my forthcoming book Tyranny of the TSH.

There is a growing coterie of physicians such as you. They’ve all enlightened themselves despite the shroud of darkness tenaciously held over the eyes of modern medicine by the endocrinology specialty. That you have freed yourself from so-called "fibromyalgia" is good. But that you’ve joined that growing clique of physicians suggests that the long-overdue liberation of millions of patients is on its way. Welcome to our side, and thank you for the patients you’ll free from the horrors of T4-replacement.

April 14, 2006

Question:
I’m retired career army, and last week I turned eighty years old. The wife is just seventy. We think the ideas you express in your book Your Guide to Metabolic Health are commendable, but with one big exception.

Before I get to that, I’ll say that your ideas in the book inspired the wife and me to get healthier and to try to live longer, partly to enjoy our great grandchildren. We’ve given everything you recommend a try. We tried swallowing all the nutrition pills you listed but we almost chocked on them. I griped so much about the pills that the wife shopped around and found that "AllOne Powder" that you  recommend. It’s got all the nutrients in it, so we’re using that now. You should tell people right up front about the powder or somebody might end up strangling on the pills. To your credit, the wife and I have made the transition from what you call the "typical American diet" to a Mediterranean diet. We’re hooked on that type of food now. Cutting out the sugar has really been good for me. I used to feel like crap half the time and that it was old age, but it was mostly the sugar. Like I said, commendations for all that.

Where you fall short is with your advice about exercise. I don’t recall you talking about old people in your book. The wife and I got some exercise videos and followed along exercising on the carpet in the den. We felt a lot better mentally, but I got so damned sore and achy and stiff that I thought I was going to die. I also had leg cramps in bed. We tried another go at it and the same thing happened. What the devil are old retired people supposed to do? If it’s going to make us miserable, should we exercise at all? The diet and powder seem like enough to me.

Dr. Lowe: Thanks so much for your qualified commendation. I am happy that you’ve benefited from some of our suggestions for improving your health and hopefully prolong your lives.

I understand your grievance about the soreness and stiffness from exercise, but I’m sure you can benefit rather than suffer from exercise—that is, if you learn to go about it properly. I will make some suggestions below. First, though, I want to say something about the importance of exercise, especially for you as an elderly man.

On page 203 of Your Guide to Metabolic Health, I wrote: "Patients who fail to exercise pay a dear price for doing so. Lack of sufficient exercise impairs their health and well-being in many ways. The harmful effects are usually worse for those of middle and old age." (Italics mine.)

To illustrated, Italian researchers recently found that compared to middle-aged men, elderly men had lower levels of three anabolic (tissue building) hormones.[1] The hormones were the thyroid hormone called T3, sulfated DHEA, and insulin-like growth factor-1 (a hormone with growth-hormone like effects). However, in each age groups, men who were sedentary had lower levels of the hormones. In contrast, men who engaged in moderate physical activity had higher levels of the hormones. The bottom line is that elderly men who were moderately active had higher hormone levels than sedentary elderly men. (You can read about the health benefits of optimal levels of these hormones in Your Guide to Metabolic Health and The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia.)

Higher, more healthful levels of these anabolic hormones aren’t the only benefits elderly people get from exercise. For example, on pages 208-209 of Your Guide to Metabolic Health, I describe a quite remarkable man, biochemist Dr. Roger Williams. He was remarkable not only when he was young, but also when he was older than you are now. In the mid-20th century, his lab developed more vitamins than in any other lab in the world. For example, he discovered the B vitamin pantothenic acid, and he concentrated and christened the B vitamin folic acid.[2] When he was 83 years old, his publisher asked him to write a new edition of his biochemistry textbook. He believed that exercise enabled him to get the job done. Here’s what he wrote about it:

"I started to work, but immediately became stalled. It was difficult to write anything, and nothing I wrote seemed worthwhile. Quite unlike my normal self, I gave up. A couple of weeks later I began to realize what my difficulty had been; the weather had been rainy. I had failed for several weeks to get adequate exercise. Soon, however, the weather cleared, and I played golf several times. On returning to the writing job, I had no trouble whatever. Evidently my brain wouldn’t work properly without exercise. I now know, of course, that exercise helps to convey good nutrition to the brain."[2,pp.126-127]

I suspect that Dr. Williams’ comment about exercise affecting his mind rings true to you, since you wrote that you felt better mentally after exercising. Dr. Williams was right, of course, that exercise increases the blood flow and delivery of nutrients to the brain. And the increased blood flow also delivers to the brain more of the increased amounts of T3, DHEA, and insulin-like growth factor-1 induced by exercise.

For those benefits and others, I strongly encourage your wife and you to begin exercising again—but with a definite qualification. It’s likely that the two of you simply exercised too vigorously for your level of physical conditioning. In our clinical experience, that’s the most common mistake of people who are just beginning to exercise. Your level of physical conditioning is probably rock bottom. Decades of sedentary life soften the flesh, making it fragile. When flesh is extremely fragile, mild exercise may strain it, leaving the person stiff, sore, or in abject pain. So when this formerly sedentary person begins to exercise, if he doesn’t want to suffer afterward, he must begin with baby steps. Baby steps means starting at an intensity of exercise that doesn’t leave your tissues stiff and sore.

There is an art to exercise, one based on principles gradually learned by those who’ve made exercise a regular part of their lives. Some of these people occasion lose their conditioning. They may, for example, have to be sedentary for months to let an injury to heal. Eventually they are able to exercise again. When they are, they know to avoid straining their deconditioned tissues by going through the process you need to start with—baby steps.

It sounds to me that you’ve never gone through this process. Because of that, I strongly recommend that you get someone, such as a physical trainer, who has gone through it to guide you. You can most likely find one at a local gym or recreation center. You may learn best from a trainer who works with sedentary elderly people, like you, who have long been sedentary. After a good trainer guides you through a program of gradual conditioning, I’m sure you’ll then have the strength and vigor to exercise with impunity.

I admire you and your wife for striving for better health at your ages, and I hope you make stretching, toning, and aerobic exercises a regular part of your health regimen. Virtually everyone who exercises properly benefits immensely from it, and surely that will apply to you, too. Advancing age, of course, imposes some limitations, but we can minimize these through a staunch commitment to getting and staying as physically fit as we possibly can. I wish your wife and you the best at it.

Reference
1. Ravaglia, G., Forti, P., Maioli, F., et al.: Regular moderate intensity physical activity and blood concentrations of endogenous anabolic hormones and thyroid hormones in aging men. Mech. Ageing Dev., 122(2):191-203, 2001.


2. Williams, R.J.: The Wonderful World Within You: Your Inner Nutritional Environment. New York, Bantam Books, Inc., 1977.

April 8, 2006

Question:
Two years ago, my thyroid gland was removed because it had multi-nodules and had grown in size so that it was very visible. I worked with an endocrinologist about 1½ years trying to regulate my Synthroid dose. During this time after the surgery, I stated having aches and pains, I was severely depressed, and my energy was so low that on some days I could barely stand. When I asked the endocrinologist whether my symptoms were related to being hypothyroid, he just suggested that I take an antidepressant and see a doctor who specializes in arthritis for the pain. The arthritis doctor prescribed prednisone for the pain, and that seemed to make the pain worse, so I stopped it. I still suffer with pain, fatigue, depression, and now I have chronic sinus problems. The endocrinologist is still adjusting my Synthroid dose. Last month, my last TSH level was 0.8, which he said was too low, so he reduced my dose from 125 mcg to 112 mcg. I feel even worse now. I stumbled onto your website looking for nutritional supplements that might help me. Do you know of any supplements that help patients who have my symptoms after having their thyroids removed?

You’ll undoubtedly benefit from nutritional supplements if you’re not presently taking them. But your main problem isn’t a deficiency of nutrients—it’s a deficiency of competent medical care.

Tragically, you’ve joined the ranks of millions of people whose health has been ruined by conventional thyroid hormone therapy. These people’s thyroid glands have been removed and, subsequently, they’ve undergone ineffective thyroid hormone therapy that has left them suffering chronically from hypothyroid symptoms. Your best bet for getting safe and effective care is to find a local alternative doctor who is committed to quality patient care. Of course, you can try to find a conventional doctor who’ll treat you effectively; chances are, though, each one you consult will insist that you stick with the thyroid hormone therapy that will simply sustain your suffering.

If you can’t find a local alternative doctor, you have several other options that are far better than conventional treatment. First, if your financial resources are limited, you can get a copy of the book I wrote for patients titled Your Guide to Metabolic Health. I made the book user-friendly and literally a by-the-numbers guide for getting oneself well from low metabolism. And that includes low metabolism from ineffectively treated hypothyroidism. Using the book to guide your own care, you can treat yourself with over-the-counter desiccated thyroid. With this approach, you can either improve your health or fully recover it. I know of many patients who have. And in my view, with this self-care approach, you stand a far better chance of recovering your health than with the T4-replacement most conventional doctors will impose on you.

Your second option—which goes along with your use of Your Guide to Metabolic Health—is to have long-distance educational consultations with me. My main aim is to educate patients such as you. During our educational consultations, I'll assess your individual needs. Then, based on what I learn of you, I’ll teach you about what you need to do to recover your health and how to go about it. You should consult with me first, then get a copy of the book to reinforce and supplement what I teache you.

Your third option is to come to our clinic in Boulder, Colorado. If you can do this, I'll conduct a comprehensive metabolic evaluation for you. The evaluation will determine the status of your metabolism—whether it’s normal, high, or low, and if low, exactly how low. To do this, I’ll use state-of-the-art instruments to evaluate your tissue metabolism. The metabolism of your tissues, of course, is what is truly relevant to helping you get well. Of course, she’ll also consider your TSH, free T4, free T3, and thyroid antibody levels. But I’ll do this within the context of what’s truly relevant—your tissue metabolism. I won’t consider only the lab test levels, for alone, these levels are of little value to any doctor; certainly they are not reliable gauges of your tissue metabolism.

I will also make another important determination: that is, whether recovering your health depends on you taking up or modifying lifestyle practices and other therapies that are synergists to the use of thyroid hormone. Such practices and therapies are often crucial to a patient fully recovering. While in Boulder, if needed, you can also see my cotreating prescribing doctor to get whatever prescriptions you’ll need to help recover your health.

You have every reason to feel hopeful. In fact, nowadays, most hypothyroid patients have reasons to feel hopeful. After some thirty years, the endocrinology specialty is finally losing it is tyrannical power to shove T4-replacement down the throats of hypothyroid patients and their doctors. You, like other patients, now have other options available to you. By availing yourself of those options, you can, with a high degree of probability, recover your health. What you must do is resolutely refuse to submit to T4-replacement and demand for yourself a safer and more effective form of thyroid hormone therapy.

Through this resolution, you can resign from the ranks of those whose lives T4-replacement has ruined. I only hope that as you cut away, you spread the word to others and take with you as many as you can off again into the more vibrant, healthier life that T4-replacement robbed from them.

March 22, 2006

Question:
I read in your book that taking vitamin C keeps people from having colds and the flu. Since I read that two years ago, I’ve been taking 250 mg two times a day, and in that time, I’ve had two colds and the flu once. Why isn’t vitamin C working for me?

Dr. Lowe: I don’t believe you’re taking enough vitamin C, but even if you were taking more, you’d most likely still have colds and the flu on occasion. However, you’d probably have them less often, and when you did, they would likely be less severe.

An effect of vitamin C on disease in general is illustrated by a study published thirty-five years ago.[1] The study included 221 dentists and their wives. The researchers determined how much vitamin C each of the 442 people consumed each day. They also had them fill out the Cornell Medical Index Health Questionnaire. From the Questionnaire, the researchers calculated how many indications of disease each person had. Then the researchers divided the people into two groups: those who consumed less than 180 mg of vitamin C each day, and those who consumed more. Finally, the researchers separated the people into three age groups.

As the graph below shows, older people had more indications of disease. In each age group, however, people who consumed more vitamin C had fewer indications of disease. The researchers weren’t specifically studying the effects of vitamin C on colds and the flu, but what they found is relevant to your  

question: Those who took more vitamin C weren’t free from all indications of disease; instead, they had fewer indications. 

By extension from the researchers' finding, taking enough vitamin C doesn't mean you'll never have colds or the flu; but you’re likely to have milder episodes

less often. This is especially true if in your health regimen you maintain multiple preventive practices. These should include regular exercise, a wholesome diet including black and green tea, and a wide array of nutritional supplements. Among those supplements, of course, should be megadoses of vitamin C.

Reference

1. Cheraskin E.
and Ringsdorf, W.M. Jr.: Predictive medicine: IX. Diet. J. Amer. Geriat. Soc., 19:962-968, 1971.

February 10, 2006

Question:
I have read several books on hypothyroidism by other doctors who describe your research. What you say about your research findings makes sense to me, so I would like your opinion on my daughter’s treatment. She is 18-years-old and has had Hashimoto's disease for 4 years. She takes Synthroid, and every 6 months when we have her TSH level  checked, her endocrinologist says that her level is in the normal range. He uses the revised levels adopted in 2002. These revised levels supposedly help doctors do better thyroid treatment, but she and I strongly feel that she still has hypothyroid symptoms. However, the endocrinologist is firm that her TSH is normal and that Synthroid is the proper treatment and he won’t change it. He said 50 years of science shows that Synthroid is all that patients need. Can he be right, and should we look for some other cause of her symptoms? That just doesn’t seem right since it’s so clear that her symptoms started with her Hashimoto’s.

Dr. Lowe: The endocrinologist may actually believe what he told you, but he’s as wrong as wrong can be. "Fifty-years of science" does not show that Synthroid is all any hypothyroid patient needs. "Fifty-years of science" is nothing more than a thought-stopping sound bite. It was concocted for two purposes: to shut up the hordes of patients who complain that T4-replacement doesn’t work for them, and to enable conventional endocrinologists to slither out of arguments against T4-replacement that they can’t counter on scientific grounds. You’ll hear the sound bite parroted by thyroid specialists such as Dr. Richard Guttler (I strongly recommend that your read my critique of his nutty beliefs about hypothyroidism), and by officials of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

Don’t be fooled by the thought-stopper, not if you want your daughter to recover her health. We have plenty of studies now that show T4-replacement to be the least effective and potentially most harmful approach to thyroid hormone therapy. It didn’t take these studies, however, for us to learn that T4-replacement doesn’t work too well. For many years, our treatment team used T4-replacement with some patients. Other patients used T3 alone or T4/T3 combination therapy. By comparison, T4-replacement simply gaves inferior results. It became obvious to me years ago that it was unethical to subject my patients to an obviously inferior approach to thyroid hormone therapy. Since then, none of my patients have used Synthroid, Levoxyl, or any other brand of T4 alone. As a result, my treatment team's clinical results are markedly improved.

The question naturally arises, Why does the endocrinology specialty continue to advocate the use of T4-replacement—and only T4-replacement—for hypothyroid patients? The reason is not scientific; it's financial, and it’s clear-cut: many influential thyroid researchers and the conventional endocrinology specialty are in bed financially with corporations that profit from this inferior approach to thyroid hormone therapy. The specialty publicly endorses T4-replacement, the corporations profit, and then the corporations share the booty with the specialty. And hypothyroid patients, such as your daughter, are the sacrificial lambs.

My strong recommendation for your daughter is the same as it is for other hypothyroid patients: find an alternative doctor who’ll treat her with T3 alone or a T3/T4 combination, adjusting her dosage by her clinical response to the therapy—not by her TSH or thyroid hormone levels. These levels are relevant only to the interaction of her pituitary and thyroid gland but tell us nothing about how the rest of a patient's body responds. Treatment results will be best if the doctor and your daughter use objective measures, such as her resting metabolic rate, resting heart rate, and basal body temperature. These are relevant to how the rest of her body responds. But her TSH and thyroid hormone levels are not relevant, and—if she’s to achieve optimal therapeutic results—should be of no concern whatever to her doctor and her.

January 31, 2006

Comment: I found your website while researching, yet again, alternative approaches to thyroid disease. I am hypothyroid after radioactive iodine treatment for Graves' disease, and still struggling to get the right thyroid dosages for myself.

I am an M.D., and although I'll admit to a certain initial hesitation about chiropractors involved in endocrinology, I was quite pleased to see your rigorous approach to the research and the proper interpretation of same.

I wanted to share with you a brief story from my own experience. As a family physician, I had seen occasional fibromyalgia patients in the past, but usually tangentially (I worked in a busy urgent care center and the fibromyalgia patients I did see were usually there for something else). I always had the feeling that we just weren't actually diagnosing what was truly wrong with fibromyalgia patients, and thought of it as a "wastebasket diagnosis."

Anyway, to make a long story short, after radioactive iodine treatment for my Graves' disease, my thyroid function plummeted precipitously. I remember vividly the day before I was finally started on thyroid hormone (with a TSH of 45!). I ached everywhere—but especially in those places that were considered "classic" for fibromyalgia. The pain was excruciating. As I sat soaking in a hot tub, near tears from the unremitting pain, I thought to myself—"Oh my God. THIS is what those fibromyalgia patients were talking about!"

Luckily for me, my symptoms resolved rapidly once I began taking thyroid hormone. But I have often wondered since how many "fibromyalgia" patients out there were actually suffering from untreated thyroid disease.

I'll admit, before having to deal with this disease myself, I thought like most doctors—that is, I treated largely by the numbers. I did have those occasional patients who couldn't make the switch from Armour to Synthroid, or who simply didn't feel well unless their dosage was so high it suppressed their TSH. I listened to them, and usually went back to the treatment they preferred, but didn't really have an explanation for why they didn't fit the mold.

Now I appreciate how truly complex the treatment of thyroid disease can be! Good luck with your work.

Dr. Lowe: Thanks for sharing your personal experience. It is unfortunate that you learned about "fibromyalgia" symptoms through personal experience hypothyroidism. Over the years, I've communicated with many MDs who learned the way you did, or from watching a loved one suffer from the symptoms after a thyroidectomy or after developing Hashimoto's. No matter what the source of the physician’s enlightenment, his or her patients are likely to benefit from it, and I'm happy about that. Thanks for treating your hypothyroid patients based on what works rather than on lab numbers such as the TSH.

December 12, 2005

Question: I'm a physician in North Carolina who uses your book The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia as a manual for treating my fibromyalgia patients. I have now gotten many of these patients well by using doses of Armour or Cytomel that my partners consider excessive. Their main concern is that the doses I use may cause heart arrhythmias. A local endocrinologist recently told one of my partners that sooner or later, I'm going to cause some of these patients to have heart attacks. Because of the documentation you give in the book, I'm comfortable using doses of thyroid hormone that are obviously necessary for the patients to get well. I am curious, however, what your current position is on the issue of thyroid treatment and arrhythmias.

Dr. Lowe: Hardly a week passes that I don't receive an email from a physician asking the same question you have. My answer here is typical of what I send to them.

The major concern of our research and treatment team over the years has been the safety of our patients. Out of that concern, I've given the subject of thyroid hormone therapy and heart arrhythmias intense focus. I have studied the entire research literature on the subject. In addition, our research and treatment team may have run more ECGs (EKGs) and ordered more advanced cardiac testing than any other clinic not specializing in cardiology.

We ran so many in years past that the results forced us to a conclusion: it's the rarest exception when the ECG rhythm of a patient is of concern. We've referred for cardiac consults the few patients who had rhythms we were concerned about. Only once did a cardiologist advise that the patient undergo cardiac rehab before beginning the use of thyroid hormone. In every other case, the cardiologist said that thyroid hormone therapy was safe for the patient. Some cardiologists said that the therapy would most likely improve the patient's cardiac health.

My years of focus on this issue boil down to a few evidence-based beliefs. Arrhythmias occur in some patients with hypothyroidism and thyroid hormone resistance. They occur when the patients’ doctors deny them thyroid hormone therapy, or when their doctors under-treat them with thyroid hormone. We usually say these patients' arrhythmias result from "hypothyroid heart."

Arrhythmias also occur in some patients with suppressed TSH levels. It's not clear at all, however, that excessive thyroid hormone stimulation causes these patients' arrhythmias. Unfortunately, the endocrinology specialty has concluded from these studies that anyone taking TSH-suppressive doses of thyroid hormone is likely to have heart arrhythmias. But this conclusion is simply illogical, and it is self-contradictory for the specialty, as I explain below.

Some researchers have reported an association of suppressed TSH levels with heart arrhythmias. These studies, however, included only elderly, sedentary individuals, some of whom were bedridden in nursing homes. None of the researchers controlled for the influence of most of the important heart-protective lifestyle factors. Because of this, the arrhythmias may have been more strongly or wholly associated with unwholesome diet, nutritional deficiencies, or low levels of cardiovascular fitness.

Also, the suppressed TSH levels of people in the studies weren't caused by thyroid hormone therapy; researchers only found the low TSH levels upon reviewing medical records of the people. This raises the possibility that factors other than too much thyroid hormone were responsible for the people's suppressed TSH levels.

For example, some of the people in the studies may have had pituitary hypothyroidism. This is a condition in which the pituitary gland doesn't produce a normal amount of TSH; as a result, patients have abnormally low TSH levels. It’s important to note that these patients have deficiencies of thyroid hormone, so thyroid hormone overstimulation couldn’t be the cause of their arrhythmias. Other patients in the studies may have had some degree of Graves' diseases. If so, then it's possible that their arrhythmias were caused by some sort of cardiac cross-reaction with thyroid stimulation antibodies.

For real clarity on this issue of arrhythmias, we must compare patients in the studies I just mentioned (elderly, sedentary, often bedridden people) to thyroid cancer patients. The comparison reveals an outrageous double standard of therapy by the endocrinology specialty.

Nearly all thyroid cancer patients use TSH-suppressive dosages of thyroid hormone. Through meta-analyses of many studies, researchers looked at the heart condition of these patients—some of whom have suppressed their TSH levels with thyroid hormone for decades. The researchers found that the suppression has not compromised the health of the patients’ hearts.

Talking out of both sides of its collective mouth, the endocrinology specialty continues to treat thyroid cancer patients with TSH-suppressive dosages of thyroid hormone, while authoritatively warning hypothyroid patients and other doctors that TSH-suppressive doses are likely to cause arrhythmias and heart attacks. The specialty's self-contradicting inconsistency is so glaring that it unveils conflicts of interest that honorable people would be ashamed to be caught in.

From my study and clinical experience of this issue over the years, I've derived a distinct impression that I justify in my forthcoming book Tyranny of the TSH: The endocrinology specialty is unyielding in its endorsement of T4-replacement, and this appears to me to be a commitment to stabilize the financial market for the associated products of T4 replacement. Those products in the U.S. include Synthroid, and importantly, they also include the TSH, free T4, and free T3 tests provided by labs.

It's my belief that the specialty uses the theoretical possibility of cardiac arrhythmias as a scare tactic to intimidate other doctors into ordering more-and-more of these lab tests, especially TSH tests. The intimidation ensures the continuing huge sales of these tests. The sales please the corporations that market the tests, and as a quid pro quo, the corporations generously share their profits with the specialty. (As others have noted, the sharing comes as huge financial grants, speaking fees, sponsoring of speaking appearances, research funds, free drug samples and patient literature, and logo gift items.)

The endocrinology specialty's obvious financial conflicts of interest are a devastating blow to its credibility. In my mind, it has none left. I hold suspect anything and everything that flows from the mouths or pens of the specialty. And that certainly includes its scientifically-indefensible claim that TSH-suppressive doses of thyroid hormone are likely to cause cardiac arrhythmias.

For documentation, see: Unrealistic Worries About Thyroid Hormone Therapy and Heart Problems: The Source and AskDrLowe: Thyroid Hormone and the Heart.

November 9, 2005

Question:
I am a 41-year-old woman who lives on the east coast. About a year ago, my doctor tested me by your protocol and lab tests. When he and I did a telephone consultation with you, he agreed to put me on Cytomel. I now take 100 mcg per day. I'm doing your protocol as you describe it in Your Guide to Metabolic Health. I take vitamin supplements daily and exercise at least three times a week. Since I started the protocol and Cytomel, I've regained my life. I have no more pain, no migraines, no swelling, no tingling, no insomnia, and I'm no longer cold all the time. The list of improvements goes on and on. For example, I've lost 65 lbs. I feel great. I suffered for 10 years of my life without a correct diagnosis, so needless to say, I don't want to go back.

The problem I'm facing is that my TSH is very low and my T3 is high. On occasion, I feel that my heart is pounding or I feel anxious. Other than these symptoms every once in a while, I don't feel overstimulated. But because of these symptoms and the lab results, my doctor wants to take me totally off T3 and send me to a local endocrinologist. I've inquired at the endocrinologist's office and learned that he doesn't believe in using Cytomel or your protocol. What can I do? There must be other options than just taking the Cytomel away completely. I feel good now and live an active lifestyle. I don't want that taken away. Please help. I'm desperate not to go back to the way I was before.

Dr. Lowe: The improvements you describe are typical of what we hear from patients using high-enough doses of Cytomel. Because of your improvements, and because your symptoms of possible overstimulation are occasional, taking you completely off Cytomel seems to me radically improper.

For someone taking 100 mcg of T3, we expect your pattern of lab results—a low TSH and high T3. However, your TSH and T3 levels are irrelevant to whether you're overstimulated or not. Two studies we just completed confirm other researchers findings: these tests are not reliable gauges of a patient's metabolic status. Many patients taking T3 have TSH and T3 levels like yours but still have severely low metabolic rates. Their metabolic rates become normal only when they increase their dosages further. Their metabolic rates become normal and they have no detectable overstimulation.

In some cases such as yours, the patient's Cytomel dose may need to be reduced. But symptoms such as occasional heart pounding and anxiety are usually not due to a patient's Cytomel dose. I say this because when Cytomel is solely responsible, symptoms of overstimulation are consistent, not occasional.

However, it's important to consider whether a patient's Cytomel dose is high enough to sensitize her to other stimulating chemicals. (Examples are caffeine in coffee, theobromine and theophylline in chocolate, and ephedrine in cold medicines.) If the Cytomel has excessively sensitized her to such chemicals, then when she consumes them in foods or medicines, she'll experiences transient symptoms of overstimulation. She'll be overstimulated for a few hours, but then the symptoms will disappear. The Cytomel will have also excessively sensitized her to her own adrenaline and noradrenaline. Because of this, emotional arousal or intense exercise might also cause temporary symptoms of overstimulation.

The proper solution to occasional symptoms of overstimulation is to find the causes and correct them. The patient's may have to reduce her Cytomel dosage low enough to relieve excess sensitivity to stimulating chemicals. And she may have to reduce her intake of such chemicals. In general, though, the proper approach is not to take the patient completely off Cytomel—not when it has relieved her troubling and disabling symptoms.

Most endocrinologists subscribe to the practice guidelines of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. When a patient such as you sees one of these endocrinologists, he’s likely to take her off T3 and switch her to T4-replacement. As many patients have told us, when an endocrinologist switched them to T4-replacement, they became ill and dysfunctional again. These reports are consistent with studies that show the ineffectiveness and potential harm of T4-replacement. The studies show that T4-replacement leaves many patients suffering chronically from hypothyroid symptoms
[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] and gaining weight they can't lose through dieting and exercise.[8] The patients are also likely to use more drugs and develop one or more of several potentially-fatal diseases.[9]

Potential harm from T4-replacement has thus been scientifically documented. In view of the risks, you must consider for yourself whether you'll permit your therapy to be changed from Cytomel to T4-replacement. If you decide not to permit it, you can seek out an alternative doctor who understands how ineffective and harmful T4-replacement is for many patients. Alternative doctors are generally more cooperative than conventional doctors, and most of them take the time to learn the cause of troubling symptoms. Because of this, you should be able to find one who'll help you ferret out and correct what's causing your occasional symptoms of overstimulation.

References

1. Walsh, J.P., Shiels, L., Mun Lim, E.E., et al.: Combined thyroxine/liothyronine treatment does not improve well-being, quality of life, or cognitive function compared to thyroxine alone: a randomized controlled trial in patients with primary hypothyroidism. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 88(10):4543-4550, 2003.

2. Sawka, A.M., Gerstein, H.C., Marriott, M.J., et al.: Does a combination regimen of thyroxine (T4) and 3,5,3'-triiodothyronine improve depressive symptoms better than T4 alone in patients with hypothyroidism? Results of a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 88(10):4551-4555, 2003.

3. Clyde, P.W., Harari, A.E., Getka, E.J., and Shakir, K.M.M.: Combined levothyroxine plus liothyronine compared with levothyroxine alone in primary hypothyroidism: a randomized controlled trial. J.A.M.A., 290:2952-2958, 2003.

4. Cassio, A., Cacciari, E., Cicgnani, A., et al.: Treatment of congenital hypothyroidism: thyroxine alone or thyroxine plus triiodothyronine? Pediatrics, 111(5):1055-1060, 2003.

5. Bunevicius, R., Kazanavicius, G., Zalinkevicius, R., and Prange, A.J. Jr.: Effects of thyroxine as compared with thyroxine plus triiodothyronine in patients with hypothyroidism. N. Engl. J. Med., 11:340(6):424-429, 1999.

6. Bunevicius, R. and Prange, A.J.: Mental improvement after replacement therapy with thyroxine plus triiodothyronine: relationship to cause of hypothyroidism. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol., 3(2):167-174, 2000 (June).

7. Bunevicius, R., Jakubonien, N., Jurkevicius, R., Cernicat, J., Lasas, L., and Prange, A.J. Jr.: Thyroxine vs thyroxine plus triiodothyronine in treatment of hypothyroidism after thyroidectomy for Graves' disease. Endocrine, 18(2):129-133, 2002.

8. Tigas, S., Idiculla, J., Beckett, G., and Toft, A.: Is excessive weight gain after ablative treatment of hyperthyroidism due to inadequate thyroid hormone therapy? Thyroid, 10(12):1107-1111, 2000.

9. Saravanan, P., Chau, W.F., Roberts, N., et al.: Psychological well-being in patients on ‘adequate' doses of L-thyroxine: results of a large, controlled community-based questionnaire study. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.), 57(5):577-585, 2002.

October 28, 2005

Question:
I have some of the hypothyroid symptoms you list on your website. They aren't severe but they're strong enough to be annoying. I have a very healthy lifestyle, take vitamins, and exercise every day. Because of that, I disagree with the doctors who've told me that my symptoms are lifestyle related. Several doctors have tested me for hypothyroidism. My T4 and T3 levels are in the lower part of the normal range, but my TSH is always low. The doctors tell me I shouldn't take thyroid hormone because my TSH shows that I'm hyperthyroid. If that's true, why do I have symptoms of the opposite condition, hypothyroidism?

Dr. Lowe: Hyperthyroid patients do have low TSH levels, but a low TSH definitely does not always mean that a patient is hyperthyroid. In fact, despite your low TSH, you may be hypothyroid. If so, that will explain your hypothyroid symptoms.

We see this lab test pattern among patients who have "central hypothyroidism." In this disorder, the patient has a thyroid hormone deficiency because her TSH is low. The TSH is low because of a problem with either the hypothalamus or pituitary gland.
[1][2][3][4][5][6] The hypothalamus normally sends the hormone TRH to the pituitary gland, stimulating it to secrete TSH. TSH then passes through the blood to the thyroid gland and stimulates it to secrete the thyroid hormone. But if the hypothalamus or pituitary gland dysfunctions for some reason, too little TSH may be secreted to properly regulate the thyroid gland. If so, the patient may have low or low-normal thyroid hormone levels, and her TSH level will also be low. An understanding of central hypothyroidism makes it clear that we can't rule out hypothyroidism based on a low or low-normal TSH level.

We've had many patients with central hypothyroidism who suffered for years because their doctors falsely believed that their low TSH levels meant they were hyperthyroid. The doctors ignored the fact that the patients had clear-cut symptoms and signs of hypothyroidism.

Incidentally, that your symptoms aren't severe but are mild or moderate is consistent with central hypothyroidism. As a group of Italian researchers pointed out, the symptoms and signs of patients with central hypothyroidism are usually milder than those of patients with "primary hypothyroidism" (thyroid hormone deficiency due to a problem with the thyroid gland itself).
[7]

In your circumstance, I think the best course of action is to get your resting metabolic rate measured. If it’s abnormally low, factors other than hypothyroidism may account for it. For example, calorie restriction, a testosterone deficiency, or lose of muscle mass may be responsible. If you rule out these and other such factors, then chances are you have central hypothyroidism. It will be useful for you to also undergo other tests to see if the results support the diagnosis. For example, low voltage of the QRS complex on an EKG is consistent with hypothyroidism.

Clearly, for doctors to depend only on TSH levels to rule out hypothyroidism can be a disservice to patients. You may learn that you're among these disserved patients if you follow through with the testing I’ve suggested.

References

1. Foresti, V. and Parisio, E.: Secondary hypothyroidism with thyrotropic hormone deficiency. Presentation of a case and review of the literature. Minerva Med., 76(49-50):2323-2327, 1985.

2. Tanaka, Y., Sawa, H., Inden, M., et al.: A case of idiopathic hypothalamic hypothyroidism. Jpn. J. Med., 20(3):222-226, 1981.

3. Ichida, T. and Kajita, Y.: A case of idiopathic thyrotropin (TSH) deficiency. Korean J. Intern. Med., 12(1):96-99, 1997.

4. Miyai K.:Pituitary hypothyroidism. Ryoikibetsu Shokogun Shirizu, (1):190-193, 1993.

5. Collu, R.: Genetic aspects of central hypothyroidism. J. Endocrinol. Invest., 23(2):125-134, 2000.

6. Hershman, J.M.: Hypothalamic and pituitary hypothyroidism. In Progress in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypothyroid Conditions. Edited by P.A. Bastenie, M. Bonnyns, and L.VanHaelst, Amsterdam, Excepta Medica, 1980, pp. 40-50.

7. Asteria, C., Persani, L., and Beck-Peccoz, P.: Central hypothyroidism: consequences in adult life. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab., (14 Suppl) 5:1263-1269, 2001.

October 4, 2005

Question:
I was recently at my parents visiting. During the visit, it became apparent to me that even after twenty years of dealing with this illness, hypothyroidism, they're even more clueless than many of the doctors I've seen. My questions are how do I get it through to my family that hypothyroidism is a big deal? How to a get them to understand that it can adversely affect a person's life and leave her feeling half dead? I'm quite frustrated with my family's response. I often don't bring it up because they behave as if it's something I should just "deal with," "get over," and shut up so we can talk about something that's actually important. It hurts and angers me to no end. What can I do to get them to understand?

Dr. Lowe: It’s unfortunate that your family doesn't understand the dreadful impact hypothyroidism can have on a patient. When untreated or under-treated—as with T4-replacement—hypothyroidism can not only ruin the quality of one's life. It can also shorten it.

You may never get your family to understand. Whether you do or don't, however, I suggest you arrange to get effective treatment. When you do, you'll no longer suffer from the symptoms you want them to understand. Their lack of understanding will then cease to be an issue. In addition, you'll also have a more enjoyable life that's likely to last a lot longer. Very best wishes.

October 3, 2005

Question
:
In the Introduction to The Metabolic Treatment of Fibromyalgia, you quote Dr. Peter Duesberg's anecdote from Inventing the AIDS Virus.
[1] I am interested in whether you agree with Dr. Duesberg's assessment that the HIV virus is not the virus that causes AIDS?

Dr. Lowe: Before studying the relevant evidence, I accepted without question the belief that HIV causes AIDS. Then, like Dr. Kary Mullis (Nobel Prize, 1993),[2] I learned that researchers have never published a study credibly showing that HIV is the cause. Indeed, researchers have failed to show that HIV is the cause by  Koch's classic postulates, or by Prof. Duesberg's alternate postulates for proving that a virus induces a disease.

Having long studied the evidence as a logician and critical analyst, I'm compelled to conclude that the belief is false. The bases of this false belief, in my view, are nothing more than science incompetence and fraud compounded by financial greed. This performance of "medical science" is a mishandling and exploitation of human illness that is tragic on a grand scale.

If you are a student of the issue, I would be interested in hearing your point of view and any criticisms you have of mine. Very best wishes.

References

1. Duesberg, P.H.: Inventing the AIDS Virus. Washington, Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1996.

2. Mullis, K.: Dancing in the Mind Field. New York, Pantheon Books, 1998. 

September 12, 2005

Question:
I have a question that I’m a little embarrassed to ask. Actually, I’m embarrassed for my MD because of his attitude. Here’s what happened. I read your book named Your Guide to Metabolic Health and yours titled The Metabolic Treatment Fibromyalgia. I was blown away by how sensible and scientific your ideas are. I was so enthusiastic that I urged my MD to read them. He’s always been cooperative and helpful to me and my family, so I was shocked and disappointed with what happened. He borrowed the books and read parts of each of them. Then when I was back in his office to get some lab test results, he gave them back to me. He said you make a lot of sense and certainly back up what you say with plenty of evidence. But he said that after reading much of the books, he realized that you’re a chiropractor. He told me he threw them aside and didn’t touch them again until I came back so he could return them to me. He said he resented that you’d tricked him into thinking you must be an MD. He said if I can find an MD who says the same things you do, then he’ll think of putting me through the treatment you suggest, but otherwise, he can’t cooperate with what I want. He asked me to ask you if you know an MD who shares your ideas. Somehow this just seems stupid to me. I was left speechless and really didn’t know what to say to him, except that I was very disappointed in his prejudiced attitude. What do you think I should say to him?

Dr. Lowe: First, let me say that very few MDs I encounter have your doctor’s attitude. I believe most of the MDs I talk with realize that beliefs, such as those we expressed in the two books you had him read, have in and of themselves, "truth value"—that is, the beliefs are either true or false, based on the evidence from which we deduced the beliefs. These MDs, which I believe are in the majority, think straight.

On the other hand, I sometimes encounter MDs who, like yours, are simply irrational, at least in this particular regard. They base too many of their decisions on the classical logical fallacy called ad hominem. This simply means that whether they accept a belief as true or false depends strictly on who states the belief, without consideration of the evidence for or against the belief.

Several years ago, I had an experience that perfectly illustrates ad hominem thinking—or, more correctly, misthinking. An editor for WebMD wrote an email to me. He was clear that he’d written because he was enthusiastic about some of my published beliefs about hypothyroidism and fibromyalgia. He wanted to publish some of the beliefs on WebMD. But he also made it clear that he could publish my beliefs only if I could refer him to an MD who would parrot my beliefs. He was flagrantly practicing ad hominem, suggesting that the readers of WebMD would consider my beliefs credible only if they came from the pen or keyboard of an MD. The beliefs wouldn’t be credible, however, if uttered by a DC. I could have but didn't given him the names of several brilliant and highly rational MDs who share the beliefs that had so impressed the editor. To have cooperated with his request would've been to condone, facilitate, and perpetuate his crooked thinking.

I wrote above that MDs such as yours are irrational, and I specified "in this particular regard." By that, I meant that I have no idea whether they are irrational in other respects. But clearly, they shamelessly practice ad hominem and fail to see how classically illogical it is. I must add, though, that when I encounter such MDs, I usually question them in depth, and I often find that they’re also highly illogical in other respects. Their irrationalities are common among people who don’t bother or haven’t learned to think straight. Their irrationalities are so common that thousands of years ago, logicians gave the thinking errors labels—such as ad hominem—to help people recognize and protect themselves from the errors.

Unfortunately, what I also generally find among these particular MDs is a mixture of both irrationality and arrogance. By arrogance I mean an attitude that they can’t possibly be wrong about anything they believe, simply because it is they themselves who hold the belief. They believe it, so ipso factor, it must be true. Irrationality and arrogance are a tough mixture to deal with. The reason is that the doctor’s arrogance protects him or her from open-mindedly evaluating the evidence that shows his or her belief to be wrong. So he or she won’t consider for a second any evidence that contradicts the belief.

A classic example of such conduct is that of Dr. Richard Guttler, a self-proclaimed "real thyroid expert." In a critique, I effectively demolished with scientific evidence his beliefs about hypothyroidism. Without addressing the evidence I'd presented, he simply slithered away from the debate. He couldn’t defend his beliefs because the evidence I provided clearly showed them to be false. And I believe that his arrogance made it impossible for him to publicly admit that he’d been whupped. I believe Guttler’s example perfectly illustrates the futility of trying to get those who are both irrational and arrogant to see how utterly wrongheaded they often are.

As for your particular MD, hopefully he’s generally rational. If you share this email with him, he may realize that a doctor—in fact, any person—of sound mind accepts and acts on scientifically correct information no matter who expresses it—an MD, a chiropractor, a dishwasher, or a garbage man. If on the other hand, he’s blinded by arrogance, maybe you and your family will fare best by questioning whether the doctor can think straight enough to make decisions truly favorable to your health and well-being. That’s a question I sincerely hope you don’t have to ask yourselves.