|
|
|
Critique of Thyroid Hormone Replacement Therapy Studies |
|
FRF
Homepage | Directors,
Officers, Advisors | Our Mission | Our
Current Study | drlowe.com Selected
Letters in Response to
Letter by Dr.
John Dommisse
November 16, 2003
AIRBORNE EXPRESS Re: The "failure" of the substitution of T3 to improve
mental Dear Dr Bilezikian, Having treated about 3,500 people with hypothyroidism extremely
successfully over the past 14-year period, I am again shocked by the
degree to which researchers (1,2) and opinion-makers (3) are
still inhibited in their approaches to hypothyroidism treatment by the
fear of causing or aggravating osteoporosis or cardiac arrhythmias.
Optimizing the serum dialysis free-T4 and -T3 levels in all my patients
has not contributed to osteoporosis at all (on the contrary, serial DEXA scans have usually shown dramatic increases in bone density despite my
never prescribing any drugs for osteoporosis but using nutritional and
metabolic corrective approaches instead); and cardiac arrhythmias are
taken care of by making sure there is no functional deficiency of any of
the pertinent minerals in the appropriate fluid spaces (RBC/packed cell
levels in the case of magnesium and potassium). Not doing these things,
and assuming
that a "normal" TSH always means normal—even optimal—thyroid
hormone function, is causing vast under-diagnosis and under-treatment in
millions of patients in the US and around the world. Surveys of patient
satisfaction with treatment, and websites devoted to this topic,
invariably show deep distrust of the adequacy of their treatment. The "fatal flaw" in both articles? In adding T3 (in the case of
the Western Australia school, in a single daily dose, which is extremely
incorrect, and in insufficient amount to even compensate for the loss of
T4), both teams still insisted on keeping the TSH within its "normal
So all these researchers are still so hooked into the TSH-only-in-diagnosis/T4-only-in-treatment approach that they can't even envisage adding T3 2-3x/day without subtracting a supposedly-equal amount of T4 in the daily intake. I say "supposedly-equal" because, after the substitution, if the TSH dropped below its "normal range," one or both doses of T4/T3 were then lowered in order to bring the TSH level into its "normal range." So even these published dosages became less when the TSH fell below its "normal" range. If, as I believe they should, they would go by the accurate (Dialysis) free-T3 and -T4 levels instead, they would find that most people on T4-treatment-only are WAY below optimal in their FT3 level and some would be suboptimal even in their T4 level—in which case T4 needs to be added, as well as T3 being added, to optimize both levels! One of the biggest losses of function in T3 deficit is life itself, as well as cardiovascular function, due to hyperlipidemia (5,6,7). By optimizing all my patients' T3 (and T4) levels, I have never had to use any statin drug to normalize anyone’s lipid levels. And the only death in my practice in the past nine years was that of a 79-year-old, very obese woman who often could not afford her treatments. The editorial by Kaplan et al admits that these authors believe that correcting ALL symptoms of ALL hypothyroid patients is an impossible dream. Since they are approaching the subject under the same assumptions as the researchers in the same issue, we can see why! Yours faithfully, References Clarifications | Selected Response Letters |